MMAPlayground.com

Forum Index > MMA General > UFC Forum
Another robbery on the UFC ?? Condit X Hendricks   [View Full Version]
Pages: [1] 2
andre_pt » Posted 2/18/13 3:02:00PM

I have a question .. The juris give more score to takedowns even if they not lead anywhere once they are on the ground than a Fluid stand up striking ??

Yes . Im talking about Condit X Hendricks .. "sloppy job" of the jurys in my opinion.

Here the stats of the fight from Espn :

Image Attachment(s):
Photo Attachment 1 Photo Attachment 2

Kpro » Posted 1/27/07 9:53:00PM

I had it 29-28 Condit and so did multiple others in the Surprise Van, but if you're on top you're winning.

_______________________________________
If I was 50 years younger I'd kick your ass!

andre_pt » Posted 2/18/13 3:02:00PM

But that doesn't make sense , being on top doesn't mean you doing good all times .. And the unamimus decision for Hendricks , exaggerated.

Kpro » Posted 1/27/07 9:53:00PM


Posted by andre_pt

But that doesn't make sense , being on top doesn't mean you doing good all times



you'll never become a judge with that attitude!



_______________________________________
If I was 50 years younger I'd kick your ass!

sparky » Posted 7/5/07 6:21:00PM

I was rooting for Condit but, I had Hendricks winning 29-28.

I hear ya Kpro though because a few ppl I watched with had Condit winning the fight. 2nd round was extremely close wouldnt have surprised me if they gave Carlos the win

andre_pt » Posted 2/18/13 3:02:00PM

I guess i dont

Chael_Sonnen » Posted 5/25/10 12:40:00PM

If you cannot stop 12 takedowns you deserve to lose...Johny CLEARLY won....a guy on his back with another fella between his legs is begging the "jurors" to score it for the bad guy (Bigg Rigg).

Another 'W' for the bad guy

_______________________________________
Mr. Playground
• 2010 - 2016 •

Kpro » Posted 1/27/07 9:53:00PM

Yeah, it was no robbery. But #1 contender fights need to go 5 rounds. Why they keep making main event fights HW bouts as 5 rounders and making the #1 & #2 contender battle in a 3 round WW tilt for the next title shot is beyond me.

_______________________________________
If I was 50 years younger I'd kick your ass!

Pookie » Posted 4/8/07 11:48:00PM

I thought Hendricks landed the harder blows on top of Td after slam after Td.

_______________________________________
BJ Penn beat Frankie Edgar more times than Benson Henderson beat Frankie Edgar.

kopower » Posted 7/3/07 12:31:00AM

I had Hendricks 29-28. Those repeated td's swayed the fight in his favor, even though he didn't do much with them. I also thought he landed the harder shots in rd 1 and 2.

I agree about #1 contender matches going 5 rounds. Johny was on his way to losing, if the fight went another 2.

_______________________________________
Billy Madison-

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in the playground is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no props, and may the mods have mercy on your soul.


postman » Posted 6/23/07 7:57:00PM

I didn't have a chance to watch any of the fights from Saturday aside for them main event was this a fight worth finding? Any other suggestions?

kopower » Posted 7/3/07 12:31:00AM


Posted by postman

I didn't have a chance to watch any of the fights from Saturday aside for them main event was this a fight worth finding? Any other suggestions?



It was definitely entertaining, and worth a watch. Ellenberger/Marquardt had a nice finish, and I enjoyed the Makdessi/Cruickshank fight.

_______________________________________
Billy Madison-

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in the playground is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no props, and may the mods have mercy on your soul.


airkerma » Posted 1/6/10 12:05:00PM

Rewatched it yesterday and have no doubt in my mind Hendricks won. As others said, his takedowns were not only too frequent, but too easy for Condit to win the first two rounds. As for striking, to me it didn't look like Condit came to life until the 3rd, he also didn't do much damage off his back until the 3rd. Hendricks clearly landed bigger shots until the 3rd round as well.

_______________________________________

tattflash » Posted 3/1/07 9:10:00AM

This was a cracking fight, and another two rounds I think Condit would of took it easily. For me it was that type of fight where both fighter's gave their all in an exciting, all action,with every style of MMA used I would not of complained who had got the decision. I also think this fight highlighted how well rounded and durable Condit is( other than TDD against top wrestler's), and in Hendricks there is someone with the speed and power to give GSP big problems

_______________________________________

Bubbles » Posted 10/20/09 3:33:00PM


Posted by andre_pt

But that doesn't make sense , being on top doesn't mean you doing good all times


that's what she said

_______________________________________
The best cure for insomnia is a lot of sex. Even if it doesn't end up putting you to sleep, you don't mind so much

Men be careful, female sexual predators are using a date rape drug called a Blowjob to trap men into scams called relationships.

Pages: [1] 2


[View Full Version of this Page]