MMAPlayground.com

Forum Index > Community > MMA News Share Forum
Rousey gets UFC belt   [View Full Version]
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
Gogoplatapus » Posted 7/24/09 6:01:00PM


Posted by warglory


Posted by Gogoplatapus


Posted by warglory

So basically what we can gather from this thread is that sexism is pretty widespread in MMA, even amongst hardcore fans. Sorry, but it's true.

There was no contention when Aldo and Cruz acquired their belts unchallenged, because they proved themselves to be the best in their divisions under the WEC banner, and when WEC merged with the UFC (thus becoming one company), the WEC champions became UFC champions. There were no existing UFC champions, so there wasn't need for a unification bout.

When Dan Henderson came to the UFC from PRIDE, he had to have unification bouts with both Silva AND Rampage. Do you think he was just simply the #1 contender? No. These were billed as unification bouts.

Had there been challengers for Aldo, Cruz and now Rousey, there is little doubt there would have been unification bouts.

But Rousey is a woman, and as people have clearly admitted in this thread, many don't consider her or other female fighters to be worthy of a UFC title, so suddenly the UFC has to change tradition to pacify fans with a demonstration of Rousey's worthiness to compete in the UFC. Do you all realize that blacks had to prove themselves above and beyond their white competitors in the MLB and other mainstream American sports before they became a normal part of the culture? I'm sorry, but this is nothing new. Rousey and many other female fighters have more than showed that they have a place in the big show, time and time again, I am fairly certain they she didn't have to give sexual favors to Dana White.

This is what the word "hogwash" was invented for.



I guess whoever said Dana is banging her could be a sexist comment but nothing else in this thread has struck me as sexist.

Bottom line is that aside from lightning striking, the product is boring and there is only one relevant fighter in the world. One.

Don't believe the hype.



"I like the idea of All Womans UFC being totally separate so I can avoid it entirely." This, sir, is sexist.



Must've deployed the go go gadget arms you're reaching so far. Dont take my words out of context, son.

warglory » Posted 2/4/07 2:44:00AM


Posted by Gogoplatapus


Posted by warglory


Posted by Gogoplatapus


Posted by warglory

So basically what we can gather from this thread is that sexism is pretty widespread in MMA, even amongst hardcore fans. Sorry, but it's true.

There was no contention when Aldo and Cruz acquired their belts unchallenged, because they proved themselves to be the best in their divisions under the WEC banner, and when WEC merged with the UFC (thus becoming one company), the WEC champions became UFC champions. There were no existing UFC champions, so there wasn't need for a unification bout.

When Dan Henderson came to the UFC from PRIDE, he had to have unification bouts with both Silva AND Rampage. Do you think he was just simply the #1 contender? No. These were billed as unification bouts.

Had there been challengers for Aldo, Cruz and now Rousey, there is little doubt there would have been unification bouts.

But Rousey is a woman, and as people have clearly admitted in this thread, many don't consider her or other female fighters to be worthy of a UFC title, so suddenly the UFC has to change tradition to pacify fans with a demonstration of Rousey's worthiness to compete in the UFC. Do you all realize that blacks had to prove themselves above and beyond their white competitors in the MLB and other mainstream American sports before they became a normal part of the culture? I'm sorry, but this is nothing new. Rousey and many other female fighters have more than showed that they have a place in the big show, time and time again, I am fairly certain they she didn't have to give sexual favors to Dana White.

This is what the word "hogwash" was invented for.



I guess whoever said Dana is banging her could be a sexist comment but nothing else in this thread has struck me as sexist.

Bottom line is that aside from lightning striking, the product is boring and there is only one relevant fighter in the world. One.

Don't believe the hype.



"I like the idea of All Womans UFC being totally separate so I can avoid it entirely." This, sir, is sexist.



Must've deployed the go go gadget arms you're reaching so far. Dont take my words out of context, son.



I'm sorry, how am I taking this statement out of context? It seems to be pretty cut and dry to me. You said that women should have a separate show from the men, despite being part of the same organization. That is quite sexist.

warglory » Posted 2/4/07 2:44:00AM


Posted by MALICE

Hmmm. Some very good points. Thank you, warglory, for your well thought out posts.



Gogoplatapus » Posted 7/24/09 6:01:00PM


Posted by warglory


Posted by Gogoplatapus


Posted by warglory


Posted by Gogoplatapus


Posted by warglory

So basically what we can gather from this thread is that sexism is pretty widespread in MMA, even amongst hardcore fans. Sorry, but it's true.

There was no contention when Aldo and Cruz acquired their belts unchallenged, because they proved themselves to be the best in their divisions under the WEC banner, and when WEC merged with the UFC (thus becoming one company), the WEC champions became UFC champions. There were no existing UFC champions, so there wasn't need for a unification bout.

When Dan Henderson came to the UFC from PRIDE, he had to have unification bouts with both Silva AND Rampage. Do you think he was just simply the #1 contender? No. These were billed as unification bouts.

Had there been challengers for Aldo, Cruz and now Rousey, there is little doubt there would have been unification bouts.

But Rousey is a woman, and as people have clearly admitted in this thread, many don't consider her or other female fighters to be worthy of a UFC title, so suddenly the UFC has to change tradition to pacify fans with a demonstration of Rousey's worthiness to compete in the UFC. Do you all realize that blacks had to prove themselves above and beyond their white competitors in the MLB and other mainstream American sports before they became a normal part of the culture? I'm sorry, but this is nothing new. Rousey and many other female fighters have more than showed that they have a place in the big show, time and time again, I am fairly certain they she didn't have to give sexual favors to Dana White.

This is what the word "hogwash" was invented for.



I guess whoever said Dana is banging her could be a sexist comment but nothing else in this thread has struck me as sexist.

Bottom line is that aside from lightning striking, the product is boring and there is only one relevant fighter in the world. One.

Don't believe the hype.



"I like the idea of All Womans UFC being totally separate so I can avoid it entirely." This, sir, is sexist.



Must've deployed the go go gadget arms you're reaching so far. Dont take my words out of context, son.



I'm sorry, how am I taking this statement out of context? It seems to be pretty cut and dry to me. You said that women should have a separate show from the men, despite being part of the same organization. That is quite sexist.



DUDE, if there was maybe even 5 or 6, rock solid 135lb woman to come into the UFC and create a viable division where we can have competitive fights I'M ALL FOR IT.

But there is ONE ONE ONE ONE competitor. Its useless. Not sexist in any shape or form, don't put that on me.

scoozna » Posted 1/25/07 12:53:00PM


Posted by warglory
"...and allows persons to dictate their own destiny.



That goes a bit far for me, but I think both sides are making good arguments here. I don't think Rousey should have to have a fight in the UFC to (presumably) win the belt. Her first fight will be a title defense anyways.

Having said that, I think the comparison to the WNBA is more accurate than not. While Rousey and Cyborg have made great strides in narrowing the skill and excitement level differences between the men and the women, a valid argument can be made that it is not quite on the same level yet. Personally, I think it's real close with those two - but not enough to make a women's division (or promotion, or league, or whatever).

Good discussion.

_______________________________________
“I don’t know what kind of technique was used there, but there was a lot of kicking and punching.” Jim Brown

airkerma » Posted 1/6/10 12:05:00PM

Not to mention a person can't dictate their own destiny, as that contradicts the definition of destiny.

_______________________________________

MALICE » Posted 9/17/07 10:04:00PM

I see Gogoplatapus' points, Bubbles' points, and warglory's points. Although I somewhat disagree with Bubbles' and warglory's points, they have definitely made me view the subject from another perspective. But I still think the UFC is not ready for a women's division. I'm sure it will be slow at first.

warglory » Posted 2/4/07 2:44:00AM


Posted by Gogoplatapus


Posted by warglory


Posted by Gogoplatapus


Posted by warglory


Posted by Gogoplatapus


Posted by warglory

So basically what we can gather from this thread is that sexism is pretty widespread in MMA, even amongst hardcore fans. Sorry, but it's true.

There was no contention when Aldo and Cruz acquired their belts unchallenged, because they proved themselves to be the best in their divisions under the WEC banner, and when WEC merged with the UFC (thus becoming one company), the WEC champions became UFC champions. There were no existing UFC champions, so there wasn't need for a unification bout.

When Dan Henderson came to the UFC from PRIDE, he had to have unification bouts with both Silva AND Rampage. Do you think he was just simply the #1 contender? No. These were billed as unification bouts.

Had there been challengers for Aldo, Cruz and now Rousey, there is little doubt there would have been unification bouts.

But Rousey is a woman, and as people have clearly admitted in this thread, many don't consider her or other female fighters to be worthy of a UFC title, so suddenly the UFC has to change tradition to pacify fans with a demonstration of Rousey's worthiness to compete in the UFC. Do you all realize that blacks had to prove themselves above and beyond their white competitors in the MLB and other mainstream American sports before they became a normal part of the culture? I'm sorry, but this is nothing new. Rousey and many other female fighters have more than showed that they have a place in the big show, time and time again, I am fairly certain they she didn't have to give sexual favors to Dana White.

This is what the word "hogwash" was invented for.



I guess whoever said Dana is banging her could be a sexist comment but nothing else in this thread has struck me as sexist.

Bottom line is that aside from lightning striking, the product is boring and there is only one relevant fighter in the world. One.

Don't believe the hype.



"I like the idea of All Womans UFC being totally separate so I can avoid it entirely." This, sir, is sexist.



Must've deployed the go go gadget arms you're reaching so far. Dont take my words out of context, son.



I'm sorry, how am I taking this statement out of context? It seems to be pretty cut and dry to me. You said that women should have a separate show from the men, despite being part of the same organization. That is quite sexist.



DUDE, if there was maybe even 5 or 6, rock solid 135lb woman to come into the UFC and create a viable division where we can have competitive fights I'M ALL FOR IT.

But there is ONE ONE ONE ONE competitor. Its useless. Not sexist in any shape or form, don't put that on me.



Are you not a fan of having a 135 division for men in the UFC? There isn't a lot of name fighters out there, but that didn't stop the UFC from establishing that division, and I have heard very few voices say that was a bad move.

Furthermore, how can you say there are no other fighters out there at 135 for Rousey? You all but admitted you are not interested in female MMA. If there were no names for her to fight, she wouldn't be a name brand right now. She came out of nowhere, because she put the hurting on well respected fighters. It's like saying there shouldn't have been a heavyweight division when Fedor was in his prime, because he beat everyone, or a middleweight division because of Anderson. There is plenty of competition at 135, you just have to bring them together.

Rin Nakai, 12-0, 9 finishes. She is very strong with good footwork and solid wrestling abilities, and would bring a solid following from Japan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvX3qayGfBc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmtHZXTqhPE

Sara McMann
Cat Zingano
Marloes Coenen
Gina Carano?
Alexis Davis

The way you made your point, you came across as feeling like there should be two separate orgs within the UFC, for males and females. If you had simply said there's not enough competition to justify a new female division, that would be a rational argument, one that I would still disagree with, but it wouldn't come across as being so dismissive of female MMA.

bjj1605 » Posted 10/11/07 4:18:00PM

For the record, I'm not in favor of 135 or 125 for men. There isn't enough talents and the fights just aren't interesting.

Same two reasons I'm not interested in women's MMA.

Bubbles » Posted 10/20/09 3:33:00PM


Posted by MALICE

I see Gogoplatapus' points, Bubbles' points, and warglory's points. Although I somewhat disagree with Bubbles' and warglory's points, they have definitely made me view the subject from another perspective. But I still think the UFC is not ready for a women's division. I'm sure it will be slow at first.


I can sort of agree with the UFC not being ready yet. They need to stockpile fighters and promote them. I can definitely see a womens TUF coached by Tate and Rousey in the near future

_______________________________________
The best cure for insomnia is a lot of sex. Even if it doesn't end up putting you to sleep, you don't mind so much

Men be careful, female sexual predators are using a date rape drug called a Blowjob to trap men into scams called relationships.

infestructure » Posted 1/18/12 9:29:00PM


Posted by warglory



Are you not a fan of having a 135 division for men in the UFC?




I would much rather have a stacked women's division than those prepubescent schoolboys fighting

jae_1833 » Posted 7/19/07 11:27:00AM

Holy shit guys! Chillax!!! My statement was more joke than serious.......yeah I think it's lame to have a 9 fight experienced fighter declared the champ in a new division that is definitely weak but in no way am I serious about her and Dana banging. I thought having a tourney or female TUF would be a cool way to introduce the new division and prove the new divisions worth to fans who have not seen WMMA. Bunch of oversensitiveness IMO for a MMA site.

bjj1605 » Posted 10/11/07 4:18:00PM


Posted by jae_1833

Holy shit guys! Chillax!!! My statement was more joke than serious.......yeah I think it's lame to have a 9 fight experienced fighter declared the champ in a new division that is definitely weak but in no way am I serious about her and Dana banging. I thought having a tourney or female TUF would be a cool way to introduce the new division and prove the new divisions worth to fans who have not seen WMMA. Bunch of oversensitiveness IMO for a MMA site.



But there is no precedent for that.

Aldo became the champ at 145 when the WEC merged with the UFC.

There is already a women's Zuffa Champion so it doesn't make sense to strip her of the title just because they are moving her to a different org.

Gogoplatapus » Posted 7/24/09 6:01:00PM


Posted by jae_1833

Holy shit guys! Chillax!!! My statement was more joke than serious.......yeah I think it's lame to have a 9 fight experienced fighter declared the champ in a new division that is definitely weak but in no way am I serious about her and Dana banging. I thought having a tourney or female TUF would be a cool way to introduce the new division and prove the new divisions worth to fans who have not seen WMMA. Bunch of oversensitiveness IMO for a MMA site.



Beware Captain Save-A-Hoe's everywhere.

prophecy033 » Posted 7/4/07 4:41:00AM

IMO womens fights are exciting. Who doesn't wanna see finishes?

_______________________________________
#2 UFC 112 Points
#9 FFC3/AFC/NEFFN/VCS/Pancrase Combo Wagers
#12 TUF 8 FINALE Points #12 Bellator 91 / Legacy FC / CCCW Combo Points #12 M-1/FA8/CFA/GC/IGF Wagers #14 UFC 143 Diaz vs Condit Points

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5


[View Full Version of this Page]