I'll take the 7 pts
_______________________________________
Ron Paul 2016
Posted by Aether
Ooooh looks like Kuivanen is pulling it off after losing the first round. As long as the judges agree my parlay should be intact.
sweet
At first when I heard Mitch had a wrestling background and was going for the first TD, I thought for sure it was going to be over for Anton as he would just get outgrappled, but he did good.
split my ass
Posted by Poor_Franklin
Posted by BuffaloDave
Should be Anton 29-28, definitely won rounds 2 and 3.
2 out of 3 judges agree w/ your assessment.
1-0
5pts
lawl bad judging, what else is new? It's just amazing the number of split decisions. Everyone has a different rulebook, I guess.
Pineda
UD
oh nice, 2 of my parlay fights are the first 2 fights. Go Pineda.
Do I need to start picking split's now? I did with Griffin/Ortiz.
Anyone think bringing in 2 more judges would make any difference?
I've got Carvohlo for the "upset"
_______________________________________
Have the playground record for most perfectly predicted fights. I think :)
I loved Carvalho's entrance theme. It was "Hart Attack", Bret "Hitman" Hart's old WWE theme.
Easy 2 point bonus, gotta love these odds
_______________________________________
Have the playground record for most perfectly predicted fights. I think :)
Wow, I thought he might upset but I thought it would be a fluke submission
I hate when I pick a guy, he performs horribly, then I don't pick him the next time, and he comes out ten times better.
So glad I kept Pineda out of the parlay.
I know Carvalho is a way better technical striker, but Pineda's striking looked horrid .
1-1 7pts
Dropped that fight 1-1
_______________________________________
Ron Paul 2016