
|
loller90278 »
Posted 1/16/07 3:05:00PM i'm watching ufc fight night and they had clips for crocop from pride!! how did they get rights to these?? another reason to back up my theory of ufc and pride working together!! your thoughts? |
|
ninesevensix »
Posted 1/24/07 5:44:00PM I think PrideFC gives UFC any footage that they want to give away. Usually it's going to be shitty stuff, no nice LHK action! |
|
hippysmacker »
Posted 1/15/07 9:10:00PM I wonder what they had to give up to get that footage, spare as it was. _______________________________________ |
|
strikefirstgear »
Posted 1/15/07 1:29:00PM They haven't had it up till now. When they introduced Crocop and Rampage the only footage they had was Rampage in the WEC (an octagon). I wonder if the UFC had a rule about showing only Octagon footage but then realized that wouldn't work with all the new fighters they want to get. Hmmm. |
|
BloodandTears »
Posted 1/25/07 2:58:00PM Yeh it was some weak footage... I wanted to see some interview footage. A bit disapointing I thought |
|
the-james »
Posted 1/24/07 5:32:00PM the footage they showed has terrible, it hsowed crocop mis with le lhk like 4 times and didnt show him knock anyone out, and the only good fottage they showed of rampage was from his fight wiht lindland in the wfa |
|
freakozoid »
Posted 1/12/07 5:26:00PM I thought it was some sort of internal advertising for fighters and feds. Or I may have the wrong intuition. In any way you look at it, those flashback vids from Pride are not at all the best to use for advertising. |
gspfan31 »
Posted 1/25/07 12:56:00AM
that footage was from wfa not wec and to the second part, the ufc showed chuck knocking out mezger for the longest time |
Reignofterror »
Posted 1/28/07 12:37:00AM
Better than A croatian flag...
|
the-james »
Posted 1/24/07 5:32:00PM
yeah youre right |