MMAPlayground.com

Forum Index > MMA General > General MMA Talk
Tito vs Forrest II at UFC 70???   [View Full Version]
hathcock32 » Posted 1/16/07 8:07:00PM

This fight is still a rumor but......should it even happen

nate22 » Posted 1/15/07 8:21:00AM

No. God no.

madmarck » Posted 1/24/07 5:55:00PM


But if it does. I hope Forrest Knocks Tito the FO. I want somebody other than chuck to shut Tito up. Hopefully someone else can KO him. If forrest takes this fight it just shows again how he has balls of steel.

nate22 » Posted 1/15/07 8:21:00AM

If it was on the undercard or not billed as one of the main fights of the night then I wouldn't mind at all.

DirtySouthBoss » Posted 2/14/07 2:48:00PM

This would be better:

Tito v. The Dean of Mean (Just ko'd Forrest and deserves a big fight)

Forrest v. Evans v. Rampage (any combination would be a good fight)

BrAeDeN91 » Posted 2/5/07 6:13:00PM

tito vs babalu
jardine vs forrest i know its gay but i want to see forrest avenge is loss
rashad vs rampage

EEKS » Posted 2/15/07 4:06:00AM

Yea i hope that if it is true that they put it on the undercard, i think the end result will be the same Tito pulls it off by decision

waylon_o » Posted 1/15/07 1:24:00PM

I don't think Dana would do this to either of them. Which ever one of them loses, their career is going to the sh**hole.

OB_Juan » Posted 1/25/07 10:52:00PM

I heard that Dana mentioned on a recent radio interview at MMAweekly that Rashad and Jardine were both being considered for Tito's possible opponent and didn't respond to rumors of a Griffin rematch.

JunCTion » Posted 1/15/07 5:40:00PM


Posted by BrAeDeN91

tito vs babalu
jardine vs forrest i know its gay but i want to see forrest avenge is loss
rashad vs rampage



i like tito/babalu
to early for a rematch so,
rashad/forrest
jardine/rampage(but 1 of them has to fight chuck 1st)
any combination of tito/babalu/forrest could really hurt the loser

hathcock32 » Posted 1/16/07 8:07:00PM

Dana made it sound like these two will not be fighting each other.



[View Full Version of this Page]