Pick'em Leagues: THE BIG SHOW CASUAL BEST OF THE REST Single Event PvP: FANTASY POOLS Betting Leagues: THE BIG SHOW BEST OF THE REST
  MMA Playground 4.0 is live!     Returning members: check out the patch notes     New members: visit our getting started guide, read the FAQ's and start playing!

Silva wins by "strikes to top of head"

Print  
  Page 1 of 2     1     2  
Posted By Message

stroff

Learning to Sprawl

stroff Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:8
Career:178-131
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: TAPOUT
Chips:
the strikes silva used to win,,,is that legal ???????

Post #1   2/4/07 10:31:02AM   

madmarck

MMA Sensei

madmarck Avatar
2

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:2,910
Career:802-575
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: Canadian Fight Club
Chips:
138
umm didnt Anderson Silva make Lutter Tap. And i dont thinkin striking to the top of the head is illegal i think it is only to the back of the head.

Post #2   2/4/07 10:54:17AM   

Moneymakers911

Learning to Sprawl

Moneymakers911 Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:21
Career:85-56
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: TAPOUT
Chips:
1
yes and no the strikes for some reason that are illegal if you are standing and bringing your elbow down on an oppoents head but if your are on your back the motion i guess changes even if your using the same part of your elbow to the same part of your oppoents head, either way i dont think lutter was getting out of the triangle

But the strike that was illegal was the low blow that Tyson Griffen took and the the Ref Steve Maza-something just said to keep going, im sure he will get some attention for that crappy call.

Post #3   2/4/07 11:00:07AM   

aceprone

Standup Guy

aceprone Avatar
1
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:325
Career:1,037-635
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: Slackers
Chips:
42
those elbows were a close call. But I think they were a just the right limit to be legal. It was a good fight. Things turned for lutter in the first round, I just wonder if he made weight it would of pushed him to actually finish the fight or put up a better fight. One thing that is interesting about Lutter is his take downs. They seem so boring and sloppy, but they're always effective. I would like to know what were Lutter's reasons for not making weight.

Post #4   2/4/07 11:00:29AM   

zephead

The Dancer

zephead Avatar
2

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:2,977
Career:541-400
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: Ground'N'Pound
Chips:
418
You can't bring the elbow straight down. It has to have a arc to it. I thought they were close to being straight down

_______________________________________
"To me the records were just a starting point," recalls John Paul Jones, "The most important thing was always the stage show. So many great nights. At our worst we were still better than most. At our best we could just wipe the floor with the lot of them. It was just a very good live band."

Post #5   2/4/07 11:00:38AM   

bayonetxwork

In Full Mount

bayonetxwork Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:771
Career:114-60
Joined:Feb 2007
Camp: TUFFS Fight Club
Chips:
58
The thing that made them legal was Silva was bringing them across his own body, which is the "arc" that makes them non-downward. Its just that the angle Lutter was in from the triangle that caused it to be practically the same weapon as a downward elbow.

Post #6   2/4/07 11:34:39AM   

madmarck

MMA Sensei

madmarck Avatar
2

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:2,910
Career:802-575
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: Canadian Fight Club
Chips:
138
they did seem legal. If the ref didnt dis allow them and lutter didnt complain. They were prob legal.

Post #7   2/4/07 11:49:32AM   

GladE8R

Learning to Sprawl

GladE8R Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:21
Career:73-49
Joined:Feb 2007
Chips:
1
They were really close....the rule is "No elbows to the TOP of the head....Silva was coming down and arching them off of his head, so it wasnt exactly illegal, had he hit him on top of the head with no movement of his elbow after the strike, it would have been illegal and Lutter would have been given time to recover.

Post #8   2/4/07 12:06:24PM   

shawneth

MMA Regular

shawneth Avatar
5




 
 
 


 
 
Posts:221
Career:397-201
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
17
Those were not illegal. They are illegal if they come straight down though. Andersons Elbows were coming across almost like a normal elbow parallel to the head. Atleast thats how couture explained it.

Post #9   2/4/07 12:22:21PM   

Stickan

the HAWT one!

Stickan Avatar
7
 
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:1,856
Career:377-180
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
143

Posted by Moneymakers911

yes and no the strikes for some reason that are illegal if you are standing and bringing your elbow down on an oppoents head but if your are on your back the motion i guess changes even if your using the same part of your elbow to the same part of your oppoents head, either way i dont think lutter was getting out of the triangle

But the strike that was illegal was the low blow that Tyson Griffen took and the the Ref Steve Maza-something just said to keep going, im sure he will get some attention for that crappy call.



Agree with everything mentioned. The elbows went in a sweeping motion as Randy explained and not the downward spike that is illegal.

Randy really said it all.

Post #10   2/4/07 3:33:44PM   

ghosty82

Learning to Sprawl

ghosty82 Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:13
Career:259-123
Joined:Feb 2007
Camp: UKFF
Chips:

Posted by Stickan
Randy really said it all.


Randy admitted that he really didn't know for sure though.

Post #11   2/4/07 8:07:01PM   

Svartorm

Hammer of the Gods

Svartorm Avatar
9
 
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:4,165
Career:2,077-1,253
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
854
Its the motion of the strike thats illegal, not the part of the elbow or anything like that. There are multiple kinds of downward elbows that you're not allowed to use. If you'd like to see which ones, throw in UFC 2 and watch Orlando Weit bet up that flabby kickboxer guy.

Last edited 2/4/07 8:25PM server time by svartorm
Edit note/reason: n/a

_______________________________________
All brave men with hearts of war, ride the path of mighty Thor.

DREAM 1 - 2nd in Pts
Cage Rage 23 - 6th in Pts
Secondary League Season 3 - 12th in Pts
Secondary League Season 7 - 16th in Wagers
Primary League Season 7 - 26th in Wagers
Secondary League Season 6 - 30th in Pts
Secondary League Season 1 - 31st in Pts
Primary League Season 6 - 39th in Wagers
Secondary League Season 7 - 41st in Pts

Post #12   2/4/07 8:25:06PM   

Sakuraba

Learning to Sprawl

Sakuraba Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:11
Career:11-7
Joined:Feb 2007
Chips:
isn`t the must-arch rule changed? seems like they elbow straight down alot..

Post #13   2/5/07 11:27:10AM   

Spiderman

MMA Regular

Spiderman Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:82
Career:72-42
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
1
I thought Point of the elbow strikes were not allowed ? also strikes to the top of the head ?

Post #14   2/5/07 3:57:13PM   

Trapt1nw0nder

BANNED

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:1,775
Career:473-286
Joined:Feb 2007
Chips:
150
only Horizontal(parallel to the canvas) elbows are allowed....Vertical no...so those were legal

Post #15   2/5/07 5:26:19PM   
 
  Page 1 of 2     1     2