MMA Playground
  Home   My Playground   MMA Forums   Stats & Data   MMA News   MMA Videos   Fighter Rankings   Secondary League   About/Info   Create Account  
Forum Index Today's Topics Unanswered Topics Search My Props Member Directory Premium Members Recent Polls Subscribed Topics Website Rules
 

Submissions or Knock-outs?

Submissions vs Knock-outs
Forum Opinion Poll
Submissions 19 41%
Knock-outs 27 59%
 
  Page 1 of 2     1     2  
Submissions or Knock-outs?
Posted By Message

Ultimate_fighter
Banned

Career record: 155-87
Season: 0-0 (#-)
Bankroll: $1,000
Location: Ogema, Saskatchewan, Canada
25
1124 posts
Joined 2/07
Which do u perfer?

Post #1   6/22/07 4:24:15PM   

loller90278
MMA Sensei

loller90278 Avatar
1
1

Career record: 164-119
Season: 34-19 (#2756)
Bankroll: $12,135 (#175)
Location: Redondo Beach
239
2368 posts
Joined 1/07
i'd prefer submissions if they're well executed (like din thomas' arm bar and nick diaz's gogoplata) more than the average KO.

Post #2   6/22/07 4:26:25PM   

pv3Hpv3p
Heavyweight Champ

pv3Hpv3p Avatar
3


3

Career record: 197-141
Season: 37-33 (#2654)
Bankroll: $985 (#7716)
Location: East St. Paul, MN
278
3093 posts
Joined 1/07
The way I see it...

The KO highlights the brutal, strength driven part of MMA

And the Sub highlights more of the art that's involved in the sport.

While a standing KO can really get your adrenaline pumping, there is something just so sweet about a great sub like Hughes's armbar on GSP or Aoki gogoing Hansen..

I guess to answer your question, I chose the KO, because it gets me fired up... But I wouldn't trade a Saku / Newton fight for all the KO's in the world.

Post #3   6/22/07 4:34:21PM   

AmericanFighterAce
Barred from Forum

AmericanFighterAce Avatar
Career record: 150-109
Season: 43-27 (#969)
Bankroll: $12,963 (#163)
Location: The Octagon
12
230 posts
Joined 6/07

Posted by pv3Hpv3p

The way I see it...

The KO highlights the brutal, strength driven part of MMA

And the Sub highlights more of the art that's involved in the sport.

While a standing KO can really get your adrenaline pumping, there is something just so sweet about a great sub like Hughes's armbar on GSP or Aoki gogoing Hansen..

I guess to answer your question, I chose the KO, because it gets me fired up... But I wouldn't trade a Saku / Newton fight for all the KO's in the world.



See Knock-Outs, can get stopped early enough that are not that exciting (see Tito Ortiz vs. Ken Shamrock) where in which someone can be defending themselves but not doing anything and the fight gets called a Knockout.

If it is a brutal GabeGo headkick to the grill of Mirko, I'll take it.

But Submissions are a lot harder to accomplish than Knockouts, it actually a lot of practice and skill to put in a very good submisson. You can get lucky with some punches with the fighters punch, but with a Submission it takes a little more skill than a Knockout.

My vote- Submission

Post #4   6/22/07 4:48:19PM   

MMA Sensei

richieb19 Avatar
1
1

Career record: 148-103
Season: 13-9 (#6084)
Bankroll: $1,545 (#4861)
Location: Calgary
170
1603 posts
Joined 2/07
I'm a judo player, and a life-time grappling fan... so you know I gotta go with the sub!

_______________________________________
Interviewer: What's something that you would like to apologize for?

Alexander Otsuka: I crapped my pants when I was 26 years old.

Post #5   6/22/07 5:08:54PM   

spider1179
MMA Regular

spider1179 Avatar
Career record: 160-99
Season: 44-26 (#1511)
Bankroll: $8,567 (#289)
Location:
2
95 posts
Joined 6/07
I would have to agree that KO's can really get your blood pumping. However, good grappling followed by a great armbar, gogo, kneebar, ect. is the most beautiful part of MMA. There is just nothing better than the guy on bottom seeing an opening and quickly slapping his opponent in a triangle and good night.

Post #6   6/22/07 5:18:25PM   

blkssncpt
MMA Regular

Career record: 168-116
Season: 36-34 (#3376)
Bankroll: $2,365 (#2556)
Location: Compton, CA.
18
199 posts
Joined 4/07

Posted by pv3Hpv3p

The way I see it...

The KO highlights the brutal, strength driven part of MMA

And the Sub highlights more of the art that's involved in the sport.

While a standing KO can really get your adrenaline pumping, there is something just so sweet about a great sub like Hughes's armbar on GSP or Aoki gogoing Hansen..

I guess to answer your question, I chose the KO, because it gets me fired up... But I wouldn't trade a Saku / Newton fight for all the KO's in the world.



your absolutely right the Art and the Brutal Drive....
But i'd have to give it to the knock out some get stopped prematurely (ortiz vs Shamrock) but for the casual fan that doesnt really know what to look for in a good ground and submission game it would have be the KO. personally i love both but id prefer the KO

Post #7   6/22/07 5:23:50PM   

cincyassasin
MMA Regular

cincyassasin Avatar
1
1

Career record: 166-109
Season: 42-25 (#2153)
Bankroll: $605 (#8264)
Location: Cincinnati
6
163 posts
Joined 4/07
Subs all day......Anybody can throw a bomb but it takes some skill to pull off a submission.

Post #8   6/22/07 5:35:13PM   

Mastodon2
MMA Sensei

Mastodon2 Avatar
2

2

Career record: 183-108
Season: 32-23 (#4471)
Bankroll: $2,080 (#3255)
Location: Newcastle England
209
2000 posts
Joined 3/07

Posted by cincyassasin

Subs all day......Anybody can throw a bomb but it takes some skill to pull off a submission.



You cannot totally undersell KOs like that, though I will admit there is a difference between just smashing your fists into someones head and actually KOing them with skill.

Look at Houston Alexander, when he KO'd Jardine it was just an ugly mess of raging, wild punches trying to bomb Jardine out. Compare that with say, Cro Cop's KO of Mark Coleman, where he didnt waste a punch, sniping targets alloever Coleman's body to open up his chin, then one perfectly timed punch square on the chin to put Mark away. There is a difference between the two styles, the first anyone with heavy hands can do, the second takes real skill and years of practice.

For me, I like the KO, I like that immense rush that makes me fly out of my seat and scream at my TV, like when Rampage KO'd Chuck in a beautiful fashion.

However, when a PPV is all KOs and TKOs I feel cheated - I like Submissions too. Having trained in Judo when I was younger, I have a great appreciation for the finesse of submissions, and at the same time a little bit of contempt for those armchair warriors that scoff "I cant believe he didnt see THAT triangle coming!" etc, because unless you've trained in it and had fights involving it, the submission game is more complex than you'd imagine.

When it comes down to it, when Im watching a PPV, I like to see a few good subs and a few good KOs. A sloppy sub that gets a win is just as unfullfilling as seeing a crude KO.

Post #9   6/22/07 6:41:11PM   

GnP warrior

papercut Avatar
Career record: 168-122
Season: 37-32 (#2654)
Bankroll: $400 (#8545)
Location: Wisconsin
13
296 posts
Joined 3/07
I prefer subs because with alot of submissions you need strength to overpower your opponent to get it locked in and theres more skill in subs not that there isn't in a KO but being able to transfer from one submission to another just seems more skillful

_______________________________________
Come inside and I'll show you where the beast lives...

Post #10   6/22/07 6:48:02PM   

DJDark41
Belt Contender

DJDark41 Avatar
Career record: 173-112
Season: 43-27 (#1925)
Bankroll: $1,718 (#4248)
Location: New York
Camp: The Pit
70
837 posts
Joined 5/07
I prefer to watch knockouts, but if I was gonna stop a guy I'd choose submission. Just the thought that I put my opponent in so much pain, they literally had to beg the ref to stop the fight...Well it helps me sleep at night.

Post #11   6/22/07 9:06:58PM   

Ultimate_fighter
Banned

Career record: 155-87
Season: 0-0 (#-)
Bankroll: $1,000
Location: Ogema, Saskatchewan, Canada
25
1124 posts
Joined 2/07
I say submission, so sweet how they get in and out of them, knockouts aren't that great for me...

Post #12   6/23/07 11:34:30AM   

Chec22
MMA Regular

Chec22 Avatar
Career record: 139-124
Season: 30-40 (#4027)
Bankroll: $2,220 (#2919)
Location:
Camp: TAPOUT
2
55 posts
Joined 1/07
I went with submission. KO's are fun but what really makes MMA is softening the opponent up with some striking, then the takedown and some ground and pound. Then good night tough guy.

Post #13   6/23/07 4:13:48PM   

Goldenrod Off-topic mod

madmarck Avatar
2

2

Career record: 199-135
Season: 39-30 (#2354)
Bankroll: $255 (#8820)
Location: NL, Canada
127
2857 posts
Joined 1/07
I cannot vote. I simply like the finish. No matter what it is. IF a fighter KO's or subs another i have no preference.

_______________________________________
its all about my training through osmosis theory. if you want to lose weight hang out with skinny people. If you want to gain weight hang out with fat people. if you hurt your ribs, eat ribs. hurt your foot, eat pigs feet. want to be taller, fuck tall bitches. - Jon Fitch

Post #14   6/23/07 10:24:53PM   

crimethinc
MMA Regular

crimethinc Avatar
Career record: 81-61
Season: 0-0 (#-)
Bankroll: $1,000
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
26
236 posts
Joined 1/07
Submissions or KO's are most exciting when they come out of nowhere. Ko's like Sell Vs. Smith really get my blood pumping. But Subs like a Chonan Vs. Silva flying scissor heel hook have the same effect. If I had to choose, it would be KO's as a personal preference. Mainly because I'm a mediocre ground guy at best myself.

Post #15   6/24/07 1:10:10PM   
 
 
  Page 1 of 2     1     2  
Log In  
Username:

Password:

Keep me logged in
Sponsors