Pick'em Leagues: THE BIG SHOW CASUAL BEST OF THE REST Single Event PvP: FANTASY POOLS Betting Leagues: THE BIG SHOW BEST OF THE REST
  MMA Playground 4.0 is live!     Returning members: check out the patch notes     New members: visit our getting started guide, read the FAQ's and start playing!

UFC's Diaz challenges suspension

Print  
Posted By Message

grappler0000

MODular Approach

grappler0000 Avatar
24
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:10,115
Career:2,643-1,469
Joined:Mar 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
2,474
Nick Diaz never has been one to go down without a fight.

An attorney representing the Ultimate Fighting Championship star filed a motion Wednesday in a Las Vegas courtroom seeking a review of a disciplinary order made against Diaz by the Nevada Athletic Commission after a hearing in May.

Keith Kizer, executive director of the NAC, said he thinks this is the first time a fighter has challenged an NAC disciplinary ruling in a courtroom in his nearly 15 years with the commission...

Full Story

_______________________________________

Post #1   9/27/12 10:25:25AM   

Bubbles

Come at me bro

Bubbles Avatar
5




 
 
 


 
 
Posts:9,368
Career:1,120-670
Joined:Oct 2009
Chips:
1,460
and this wasn't addressed back in the earlier court dates?

_______________________________________
The best cure for insomnia is a lot of sex. Even if it doesn't end up putting you to sleep, you don't mind so much

Men be careful, female sexual predators are using a date rape drug called a Blowjob to trap men into scams called relationships.

Post #2   9/27/12 11:40:29AM   

grappler0000

MODular Approach

grappler0000 Avatar
24
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:10,115
Career:2,643-1,469
Joined:Mar 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
2,474

Posted by Bubbles

and this wasn't addressed back in the earlier court dates?



It was, but a NSAC trial isn't run like a court of law. The AC's are the judge, jury, and executioner in their own courtroom.

Last edited 9/27/12 11:54AM server time by grappler0000
Edit note/reason: n/a

_______________________________________

Post #3   9/27/12 11:54:14AM   

Manak

Belt Contender

Manak Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:951
Career:164-106
Joined:Jun 2007
Camp: UFC-PRIDE-MMA
Chips:
176
and this is why you never take an athlete retiring serious.. they always come back

but i thought he already lost the case in the 1st appeal

Post #4   9/27/12 12:02:47PM   

Kpro

I STAB WATERBEDS!

Kpro Avatar
17
 
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:7,036
Career:2,360-1,218
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
1,838
The only reason they won the hearing is because they are their own judge and jury.

The NSAC is horrible at what they do.

_______________________________________
If I was 50 years younger I'd kick your ass!

Post #5   9/27/12 12:06:20PM   

ghandikush

MMA Sensei

ghandikush Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:1,376
Career:118-71
Joined:Jul 2011
Chips:
213

Posted by Kpro

The only reason they won the hearing is because they are their own judge and jury.

The NSAC is horrible at what they do.



Theyre excellent at never losing. Good old Nevada.

Post #6   9/27/12 1:23:43PM   

scoozna

Liver shot!

scoozna Avatar
7
 
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:2,999
Career:2,185-1,229
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
593

The attorney further claims medical marijuana is not an over-the-counter medication, nor is it a prescription, because physicians can only recommend it to a patient.


Haaa...then what is it? I hope they are not going to argue that it is just a plant and not a drug.

And I wonder *how long* before a fight the NAC would require a fighter to stop taking Marijuana. If 8 days is not enough, how about 12? 16? 1 year?

Challenging an $80k fine is good, but I just hope this lawyer doesn't sponge off of Diaz for too long.

Last edited 9/27/12 2:55PM server time by scoozna
Edit note/reason: n/a

_______________________________________
“I don’t know what kind of technique was used there, but there was a lot of kicking and punching.” Jim Brown

Post #7   9/27/12 2:54:50PM   

Bubbles

Come at me bro

Bubbles Avatar
5




 
 
 


 
 
Posts:9,368
Career:1,120-670
Joined:Oct 2009
Chips:
1,460

Posted by grappler0000


Posted by Bubbles

and this wasn't addressed back in the earlier court dates?



It was, but a NSAC trial isn't run like a court of law. The AC's are the judge, jury, and executioner in their own courtroom.


then what is the point of trying to fight them? Could they not appeal the original suspension through the court of law?

_______________________________________
The best cure for insomnia is a lot of sex. Even if it doesn't end up putting you to sleep, you don't mind so much

Men be careful, female sexual predators are using a date rape drug called a Blowjob to trap men into scams called relationships.

Post #8   9/27/12 3:54:49PM   

Kpro

I STAB WATERBEDS!

Kpro Avatar
17
 
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:7,036
Career:2,360-1,218
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
1,838

Posted by scoozna

*how long* before a fight the NAC would require a fighter to stop taking Marijuana. If 8 days is not enough, how about 12? 16? 1 year?




That's the conundrum. The NSAC is fine with athletes using marijuana out of competition and have specifically said so, but they won't give a time-table on `out-of-competition` though if you listen to interviews years ago they say they only want to make sure no one his feeling the effects during a fight because it could be dangerous. By the time your body has metabolized the thc and you test positive for metabolites all psychoactive, hallucinogenic, painkilling, or whatever else they feel may give an unfair advantage has been proven to have no active effects that can increase or decrease a fighter's performance. The hearing was a farce, the 2-3 hours full hearing is on YouTube but it's really a waste of time.

Last edited 9/27/12 3:58PM server time by Kpro
Edit note/reason: n/a

_______________________________________
If I was 50 years younger I'd kick your ass!

Post #9   9/27/12 3:57:55PM   

grappler0000

MODular Approach

grappler0000 Avatar
24
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:10,115
Career:2,643-1,469
Joined:Mar 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
2,474

Posted by scoozna


The attorney further claims medical marijuana is not an over-the-counter medication, nor is it a prescription, because physicians can only recommend it to a patient.


Haaa...then what is it? I hope they are not going to argue that it is just a plant and not a drug.

And I wonder *how long* before a fight the NAC would require a fighter to stop taking Marijuana. If 8 days is not enough, how about 12? 16? 1 year?

Challenging an $80k fine is good, but I just hope this lawyer doesn't sponge off of Diaz for too long.



Basically, a doctor gives you a license to use marijuana. He doesn't recommend it. He doesn't write a prescription. He gives you the option to seek it out on your own as an alternative to other methods of treatment.

As the rules are currently written, the length of time "shouldn't" matter, as long as it's not active in the system at the time of the fight...and metabolites only prove past use. The problem here is that the NSAC just does a little word magic and sweeps it under the rug, rather than look at the logic behind the argument.

I hope Diaz takes this as far as needed TBH. I'm tired of the AC's screwing fighters just to save face.

_______________________________________

Post #10   9/27/12 4:10:05PM   

ghandikush

MMA Sensei

ghandikush Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:1,376
Career:118-71
Joined:Jul 2011
Chips:
213

Posted by grappler0000


Posted by scoozna


The attorney further claims medical marijuana is not an over-the-counter medication, nor is it a prescription, because physicians can only recommend it to a patient.


Haaa...then what is it? I hope they are not going to argue that it is just a plant and not a drug.

And I wonder *how long* before a fight the NAC would require a fighter to stop taking Marijuana. If 8 days is not enough, how about 12? 16? 1 year?

Challenging an $80k fine is good, but I just hope this lawyer doesn't sponge off of Diaz for too long.



Basically, a doctor gives you a license to use marijuana. He doesn't recommend it. He doesn't write a prescription. He gives you the option to seek it out on your own as an alternative to other methods of treatment.

As the rules are currently written, the length of time "shouldn't" matter, as long as it's not active in the system at the time of the fight...and metabolites only prove past use. The problem here is that the NSAC just does a little word magic and sweeps it under the rug, rather than look at the logic behind the argument.

I hope Diaz takes this as far as needed TBH. I'm tired of the AC's screwing fighters just to save face.



Post #11   9/27/12 4:12:35PM   

grappler0000

MODular Approach

grappler0000 Avatar
24
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:10,115
Career:2,643-1,469
Joined:Mar 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
2,474

Posted by Bubbles


Posted by grappler0000


Posted by Bubbles

and this wasn't addressed back in the earlier court dates?



It was, but a NSAC trial isn't run like a court of law. The AC's are the judge, jury, and executioner in their own courtroom.


then what is the point of trying to fight them? Could they not appeal the original suspension through the court of law?



Everything has a process and an order. You have to adhere to that order or everyone (with money) would just go directly to the Supreme Court anytime their was an unfavorable ruling.

_______________________________________

Post #12   9/27/12 4:16:33PM   

Bubbles

Come at me bro

Bubbles Avatar
5




 
 
 


 
 
Posts:9,368
Career:1,120-670
Joined:Oct 2009
Chips:
1,460

Posted by grappler0000

Everything has a process and an order. You have to adhere to that order or everyone (with money) would just go directly to the Supreme Court anytime their was an unfavorable ruling.


I'm saying that rather than having that initial hearing through the NSAC where there is obvious bias, take it to a general court where the judge/jury isn't also the prosecutor.

_______________________________________
The best cure for insomnia is a lot of sex. Even if it doesn't end up putting you to sleep, you don't mind so much

Men be careful, female sexual predators are using a date rape drug called a Blowjob to trap men into scams called relationships.

Post #13   9/27/12 7:02:16PM   

grappler0000

MODular Approach

grappler0000 Avatar
24
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:10,115
Career:2,643-1,469
Joined:Mar 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
2,474

Posted by Bubbles


Posted by grappler0000

Everything has a process and an order. You have to adhere to that order or everyone (with money) would just go directly to the Supreme Court anytime their was an unfavorable ruling.


I'm saying that rather than having that initial hearing through the NSAC where there is obvious bias, take it to a general court where the judge/jury isn't also the prosecutor.



That would be leaping the appeal process with the NSAC.

_______________________________________

Post #14   9/27/12 8:36:14PM