Pick'em Leagues: THE BIG SHOW CASUAL BEST OF THE REST Single Event PvP: FANTASY POOLS Betting Leagues: THE BIG SHOW BEST OF THE REST

White threatens no UFC in CA if AB 2100 passes

Print  
Posted By Message

grappler0000

MODular Approach

grappler0000 Avatar
27
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:10,218
Career:3,018-1,645
Joined:Mar 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
2,507
UFC head Dana White has threatened to cease holding events in the state of California if a controversial piece of legislation passes in the state. Assembly Bill 2100 was introduced last Wednesday and is supported by the Culinary Workers Union while opposed by the UFC among others.


Via San Jose Mercury:

(Assembly member Luis) Alejo wants to eliminate what he sees as abusive contracts, freeing up fighters to make Assembly Bill 2100 would prevent promoters from claiming unreasonable future merchandising rights, prevent unreasonable restrictions on fighters’ seeking outside sponsors and prohibit other onerous contract provisions.

Full Story

_______________________________________

Post #1   4/30/12 3:53:10PM   

Pookie

Remember Paul Herrera

Pookie Avatar
8
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:9,608
Career:1,959-1,091
Joined:Apr 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
1,788
good strategy by White.

_______________________________________
BJ Penn beat Frankie Edgar more times than Benson Henderson beat Frankie Edgar.

Post #2   4/30/12 3:57:17PM   

george112

The Playground OG

george112 Avatar
3


 
 
 


 
 
Posts:5,420
Career:1,321-858
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: Playground Legends
Chips:
1,071
What a doosh

_______________________________________
Ron Paul 2016

Post #3   4/30/12 3:58:09PM   

BeeR

MMA Sensei

BeeR Avatar
1
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:1,302
Career:681-411
Joined:Jun 2009
Chips:
345
Dana is an F-ing baby.

Post #4   4/30/12 4:46:32PM   

Manak

Belt Contender

Manak Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:958
Career:164-106
Joined:Jun 2007
Camp: UFC-PRIDE-MMA
Chips:
179
I like the bill, feel it is pretty ridiculous that they can keep a guy from making a living but keep making money off his name in video games & merchandise

Post #5   4/30/12 5:14:20PM   

prophecy033

REBEL WITH A CAUSE

prophecy033 Avatar
8
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:9,624
Career:2,146-1,245
Joined:Jul 2007
Camp: Project Mayhem
Chips:
1,532
I think its Bullshit that companies can hold those rights in the first place and for Dana to birch and moan and wanna take his ball and go home is a bitch move. GROW UP DANA!!!!!

_______________________________________

Post #6   4/30/12 6:20:50PM   

ncordless

MODulation

ncordless Avatar
12
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:4,857
Career:1,958-1,117
Joined:Apr 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
1,102
All talk by Dana. I guarantee he does not have the final say in something like that.

Giving up the questionable terms that this bill prohibits does not outweigh the loss of putting on shows in Cali, especially northern cal since it is so far away from Vegas. What's more, my hunch is any mma bill in ny will have the same language.

But you never know, I guess. The Fertitas are making a stand on principle against the unions even though it sure seems like the costs are outweighing the benefits. Since they are obviously not concerned with that kind of utilitarian logic, it might be that the costs will never outweigh the benefits of not allowing unions in their casinos for them. This cali bill is a result of it, their investigation is a result of it, no mma in new york is a result of it, and there is a good chance the heat Busch is getting for sponsoring UFC is a result of it.

SEIU plays hardball, that's a fact of life in general and especially in Vegas. This shit will never ends until Fertita's casinos go union. I wish they would, because MMA is going to inevitably be the thing that gets harmed in the dispute, even though it has nothing to do with the thing except Fertita's ownership. Fertita's gotta go union or the gotta sell the UFC.



_______________________________________
Flame Not, Lest Ye Be Flamed Yourself.

Post #7   5/1/12 2:00:34AM   

machodog76

MMA Sensei

machodog76 Avatar
7
 
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:1,122
Career:2,857-1,759
Joined:Jun 2007
Camp: country KO
Chips:
232
Don't be fooled this bill is an attack on the UFC more than an attempt at expanding rights for fighters. One of the key parts of it is the banning of exclusive contracts, this would destroy MMA as we know it. The sponsor is a tool from what I heard on MMA live. He claims the impetus for the bill came from him watching the Outside the Lines, "documentary" on ESPN that was an editorial piece at best and yellow journalism at worst. I agree that fighters should not have to sign their likeness away permanently for things like video games but this bill is not the way to get there.

Last edited 5/1/12 9:30PM server time by machodog76
Edit note/reason: wrong name

Post #8   5/1/12 1:46:32PM   

BlueSkiesBurn

USCFootball.com

BlueSkiesBurn Avatar
1
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:6,667
Career:534-389
Joined:Jun 2008
Chips:
713
Being that I'm from California, I should know more about this bill. I'll need to do some research before commenting fully, but I'm not sure if it's a wise idea to eliminate one of the biggest markets in the U.S.

Post #9   5/1/12 5:13:23PM   

telnights

MODesty

telnights Avatar
14
 
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:2,947
Career:1,449-799
Joined:Jun 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
557
I would like to see the full details on AB2100 before saying White is in the wrong.

Last edited 5/2/12 5:58PM server time by telnights
Edit note/reason: n/a

_______________________________________
MMA Playground Mod
Telnights

Post #10   5/1/12 8:41:04PM