Pick'em Leagues: THE BIG SHOW CASUAL BEST OF THE REST Single Event PvP: FANTASY POOLS Betting Leagues: THE BIG SHOW BEST OF THE REST

UFC Judges after Sherk vs Dunham

Print  
What is your opinion on the judges?
They know what they are doing 7 15%
They should get released 9 19%
Bunch of re$%6ds ! 31 66%
  Page 1 of 2     1     2  
Posted By Message

duniek

MMA Regular

duniek Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:71
Career:1,720-1,146
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: Duniek
Chips:
4
I am so upset after this fight I don't have enough bad words to describe what I think about those people end the quality of their work !!!
Are You with me on this?

Last edited 9/25/10 11:17PM server time by duniek
Edit note/reason: n/a

Post #1   9/25/10 11:16:44PM   

jae_1833

TTTHS

jae_1833 Avatar
6





 
 
 


 
 
Posts:7,897
Career:2,562-1,630
Joined:Jul 2007
Camp: Project Mayhem
Chips:
1,021
It's about par for the course really....I personally judge on a hybrid of American and Japanease criteria....by round, but with "closest to ending the fight" , also control and effective striking...using my system Dunham would have stolen the 2nd round....but using a strict American system, he did not. Sherk controlled over half of the round with his wrestling, Sherk also definately won round one IMO...3rd was Dunham obviously.

Post #2   9/25/10 11:59:45PM   

Chael_Sonnen

Follow.The.Buzzards

Chael_Sonnen Avatar
6





 
 
 


 
 
Posts:5,009
Career:1,277-785
Joined:May 2010
Chips:
1,409
Dunham won that fight.

_______________________________________
Mr. Playground
• 2010 - 2016 •

Post #3   9/26/10 1:00:43AM   

ncordless

MODulation

ncordless Avatar
12
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:4,843
Career:1,873-1,070
Joined:Apr 2007
Camp: The Ringers
Chips:
1,098
Round 2 was close enough that I can't complain too much, but there is no reason under the Unified rules or any other that Dunham shouldn't have won round 2.

_______________________________________
Flame Not, Lest Ye Be Flamed Yourself.

Post #4   9/26/10 1:03:13AM   

Chael_Sonnen

Follow.The.Buzzards

Chael_Sonnen Avatar
6





 
 
 


 
 
Posts:5,009
Career:1,277-785
Joined:May 2010
Chips:
1,409

Posted by duniek

I am so upset after this fight I don't have enough bad words to describe what I think about those people end the quality of their work !!!
Are You with me on this?



TOTALLY AGREE!!! Baaad decision!!!!!!!

_______________________________________
Mr. Playground
• 2010 - 2016 •

Post #5   9/26/10 1:04:48AM   

prozacnation1978

Heavyweight Champ

prozacnation1978 Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:12,723
Career:2,394-1,281
Joined:Jul 2007
Camp: Dark Horse
Chips:
914
The takedowns and cut did it

Post #6   9/26/10 1:40:46AM   

Aether

Heavyweight Champ

Aether Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:5,068
Career:946-505
Joined:Apr 2007
Chips:
1,039
I thought Dunham won the second and third pretty decisively. The second was closer, but I still think Dunham was controlling the majority of the round, and doing far more damage during his time in control than Bader was in his.

This is why I don't purchase UFC events.

Post #7   9/26/10 1:55:57AM   

tmas

Belt Contender

tmas Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:886
Career:1,071-844
Joined:Jun 2007
Chips:
117

Posted by Aether

I thought Dunham won the second and third pretty decisively. The second was closer, but I still think Dunham was controlling the majority of the round, and doing far more damage during his time in control than Bader was in his.

This is why I don't purchase UFC events.



its not the UFC's fault its the judges/commission.....



really bad dec

Dunham won 2nd round fairly close but i thought he won
3rd round he won easy.

i had it 29-28 Dunham easy dec imo...

Post #8   9/26/10 2:00:02AM   

Aether

Heavyweight Champ

Aether Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:5,068
Career:946-505
Joined:Apr 2007
Chips:
1,039

Posted by tmas


Posted by Aether

I thought Dunham won the second and third pretty decisively. The second was closer, but I still think Dunham was controlling the majority of the round, and doing far more damage during his time in control than Bader was in his.

This is why I don't purchase UFC events.



its not the UFC's fault its the judges/commission.....



really bad dec

Dunham won 2nd round fairly close but i thought he won
3rd round he won easy.

i had it 29-28 Dunham easy dec imo...



Yeah, I understand that, but the UFC also has the power to lead the way for all of the other organizations by doing something other than shrugging and saying "don't leave it in the hands of the judges."

Post #9   9/26/10 2:03:39AM   

Jackelope

Go ahead, MOD my day

Jackelope Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:7,224
Career:864-486
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
1,202
Dunham got jobbed and that's really all there is to it. Just another chapter in the book of fails written by MMA judges

Post #10   9/26/10 4:03:34AM   

1daveufc

Standup Guy

1daveufc Avatar
2

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:447
Career:612-433
Joined:Dec 2008
Camp: East Coast Pitbulls
Chips:
23
I think sherk won the fight he won the first and it was the take downs and control that won him the second.Dunham won the third but lost a really close fight but once again the fighters shud not leave it in the hands of the judges.

Post #11   9/26/10 4:29:32AM   

BustedKnuckle

MMA Sensei

BustedKnuckle Avatar
3


 
 
 


 
 
Posts:1,445
Career:659-381
Joined:Sep 2009
Chips:
92
The cut and all the blood sways the judges a lot IMO. If not for the cut I think Dunham gets the nod.

Post #12   9/26/10 9:18:36AM   

kaduey

In Full Mount

kaduey Avatar
2

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:573
Career:1,537-829
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
68

Posted by Aether

I thought Dunham won the second and third pretty decisively. The second was closer, but I still think Dunham was controlling the majority of the round, and doing far more damage during his time in control than Bader was in his.

This is why I don't purchase UFC events.



The last part of your comment is pure ignorance. Everytime someone has an issue with negative outcomes in North American mma (eg. steroids, referees, judging), the UFC and/or Dana is to blame. This is out of the UFC's hands so find another reason to not pay for the best mma promotion out there.

Post #13   9/26/10 10:19:46AM   

Aether

Heavyweight Champ

Aether Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:5,068
Career:946-505
Joined:Apr 2007
Chips:
1,039

Posted by kaduey


Posted by Aether

I thought Dunham won the second and third pretty decisively. The second was closer, but I still think Dunham was controlling the majority of the round, and doing far more damage during his time in control than Bader was in his.

This is why I don't purchase UFC events.



The last part of your comment is pure ignorance. Everytime someone has an issue with negative outcomes in North American mma (eg. steroids, referees, judging), the UFC and/or Dana is to blame. This is out of the UFC's hands so find another reason to not pay for the best mma promotion out there.



I already responded to this.

Post #14   9/26/10 11:22:23AM   

Cdellorso

In Full Mount

Cdellorso Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:540
Career:647-447
Joined:Jul 2007
Camp: Wild Wind
Chips:
66
I was so numb to the questionable judging that I was Totally " MEH" to

1. Guillard over Stephens- Effective striking- Stephens- Landed better haerder more effective strikes-
Ring control? well Stephens couldnt Control Melvin baking away 97% of the time-
he did explode forward some but those punches.. IF they landed were very soft by no reaction or physichal damage - Agression - stephens clearly


2. Bader NOG- I thought the outcome was fine but one judge had bader winning all 3 rounds?

3 Sherk Dunham - well losts of post already - it was a close foght but really dunham won the 1st part of rd 1 then the cut and take/down control clearly Sherk- i gave a close 2 to dunham and 3 was ALL dunham- Usually the rd 3 winner in a close fight wins the fight.

I dont know what can be done but I wish scoring was a bit more clear

Post #15   9/26/10 11:25:03AM   
 
  Page 1 of 2     1     2