MMA Playground
  Home   My Playground   MMA Forums   Stats & Data   MMA News   MMA Videos   Fighter Rankings   Secondary League   About/Info   Create Account  
Forum Index Today's Topics Unanswered Topics Search My Props Member Directory Premium Members Recent Polls Subscribed Topics Website Rules
 

Cage Or Ring? What do you think?

  Page 1 of 8     1     2     3     4   >>
Cage Or Ring? What do you think?
Posted By Message

VanellaL47
Learning to Sprawl

VanellaL47 Avatar
Career record: 32-31
Season: 10-8 (#7017)
Bankroll: $1,315 (#5806)
Location: California, PA
2
45 posts
Joined 4/07
Now that UFC and PRIDE have merged into one organization, what style of fighting arena should be used. Some say the cage and others feel that the ring should be used. What are your thoughts?

Post #1   4/15/07 7:13:26PM   

Northrend
In Full Mount

Northrend Avatar
Career record: 94-52
Season: 0-0 (#-)
Bankroll: $1,000
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
40
701 posts
Joined 2/07
I like the ring cause its easier to see and you can't just lay people on the fence. But I don't think UFC will ever get rid of their cage.

Post #2   4/15/07 7:16:57PM   

xthe_scottx
In Full Mount

2

2

Career record: 196-114
Season: 27-22 (#4398)
Bankroll: $7,639 (#344)
Location: Fort Bragg, North Carolina
33
527 posts
Joined 1/07
I personally say the caged octagon. It eliminates distinct corners and doesn't have the problem of fighters falling out or having to restart the fight in the center. While I've been told it doesn't have good visibility live, most people aren't watching live.

Post #3   4/15/07 7:20:25PM   

Junior24
MMA Regular

Junior24 Avatar
Career record: 62-50
Season: 0-0 (#-)
Bankroll: $1,000
Location: Washington
4
102 posts
Joined 3/07
I think they should use both. Kinda like in tennis. Where one tourney is clay, the next is grass, next is hard, etc. I think it would be good for MMA. I think Pride shud do the same thing.

Post #4   4/15/07 7:22:12PM   

Boondock Saints Mod

hippysmacker Avatar
3


3

Career record: 220-126
Season: 50-20 (#137)
Bankroll: $2,236 (#2870)
Location: California
336
3820 posts
Joined 1/07
Pinned to stop repeat threads.

I prefer the cage.
1. People I know who prefer the ring always say it's better for viewing. Agreed , but if 20, 000 people are watching it live, and 10 million are watching it on TV , it seems an irrelevant argument to me. Majority rules the majority of the time.
2. No one gets caught in the ropes in a cage
3. No one falls or jumps out of the cage. Horodecki/Palaszewski a recent example
4. I like the Thunderdome aspect of the cage. Doors locked and no way out till the fights over. " 2 men enter , 1 man leave" the winner that is

_______________________________________
“Never violate a woman, nor harm a child. Do not lie, cheat or steal. These things are for lesser men. Protect the weak against the evil strong. And never allow thoughts of gain to lead you into the pursuit of evil. Never back away from an enemy. Either fight or surrender. It is not enough to say I will not be evil. Evil must be fought wherever it is found.”
The Iron Code

Post #5   4/15/07 7:36:22PM   

GnP warrior

papercut Avatar
Career record: 168-122
Season: 37-32 (#2654)
Bankroll: $400 (#8545)
Location: Wisconsin
13
296 posts
Joined 3/07

Posted by xthe_scottx

I personally say the caged octagon. It eliminates distinct corners and doesn't have the problem of fighters falling out or having to restart the fight in the center.



I think its better if people aren't falling out of the ring and making them stop to move back to the center

_______________________________________
Come inside and I'll show you where the beast lives...

Post #6   4/15/07 7:40:09PM   

Juggernaut
MMA Regular

Juggernaut Avatar
Career record: 27-18
Season: 0-0 (#-)
Bankroll: $1,000
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
0
54 posts
Joined 4/07

Posted by xthe_scottx

I personally say the caged octagon. It eliminates distinct corners and doesn't have the problem of fighters falling out or having to restart the fight in the center. While I've been told it doesn't have good visibility live, most people aren't watching live.



I agree with that completely. alot of fights in the ring end when somebody gets driven into the corner and can't do anything. and also ther is the oppertunity and insticnt to grab the ropes when you're in the corner. the cage eliminates this and also gives the fighters more room to work and move around whichmeans alot more things are possible. everybody who has ever foght before knows that more room makes alot of a difference

Post #7   4/15/07 8:18:27PM   

Laying down the beats

Rush Avatar
5




5

Career record: 192-150
Season: 37-33 (#1810)
Bankroll: $3,377 (#1087)
Location: Canada
605
4928 posts
Joined 1/07
I think I am leaning towards the cage, but in defense of the ring, the ropes allow a more complex form of GnP. You can GnP from more angles through the ropes. With that said the ring offered the ability of stomping through the ropes. Since this rule is now obsolete, under the unified rules, I am not sure if the ring offers more pros than cons.

Ropes are easier to grab than the cage too.

On the flipside, I find that a lot of ground action in the UFC occurs on the fence. I think this really slows down the action.

_______________________________________
MMA Playground Ninja Moderator - Be cool and follow forum conduct or you'll be banned and all you will see is a puff of smoke. Members banned - 31, IPs banned - 19

Post #8   4/15/07 11:52:00PM   

Orlandi0053
Learning to Sprawl

Orlandi0053 Avatar
Career record: 43-34
Season: 0-0 (#-)
Bankroll: $1,000
Location: Sayre, PA
1
21 posts
Joined 4/07

Posted by Junior24

I think they should use both. Kinda like in tennis. Where one tourney is clay, the next is grass, next is hard, etc. I think it would be good for MMA. I think Pride shud do the same thing.





I think both would be nice and it still would show that they didnt completly got rid of everythign pride

Post #9   4/16/07 1:14:18AM   

garrick
MMA Regular

garrick Avatar
Career record: 143-84
Season: 11-7 (#6907)
Bankroll: $1,445 (#5239)
Location: Vermont
Camp: Pitbulls
2
103 posts
Joined 3/07
Their not getting rid of everything from pride, but UFC bought pride, therefore it should be an octagon.

Post #10   4/16/07 11:29:05AM   

WarWagon Never Die!

JimiMak Avatar
1
1

Career record: 173-125
Season: 34-36 (#3376)
Bankroll: $160 (#9055)
Location: talkin trash to the garbage around me
161
1503 posts
Joined 1/07
Hopefully we'll never see PRIDE adopt the cage. We will absolutely never see the UFC adopt a ring. I like that there is both. I heavily prefer the ring but have done this conversation to death already. Noone ever believes it can work but I think the open mat brings it down to the essentials, two guys w/o interference from an enclosed environment. Like they do in grappling tournaments. There has been mma done this way, but not by any major organization that I know of.

Here's link to a long conversation we've already had on here abuot this where I provided some good links to some open mat mma matches.

Last edited 4/16/07 4:38PM by JimiMak
Edit note/reason: n/a

_______________________________________
There can be ONLY 1 WarWagon

Post #11   4/16/07 4:25:53PM   

Basshandsome
MMA Regular

Basshandsome Avatar
2

2

Career record: 198-97
Season: 52-18 (#99)
Bankroll: $10,209 (#239)
Location: London, On
57
248 posts
Joined 4/07
I really perfer the octogan. In the ring, they have to constantly stop the action and move it back to the center which gives the fighters time to regroup a little. I say leave the ring to professional wrestling...

Post #12   4/17/07 4:24:01AM   

BigWilly
Learning to Sprawl

BigWilly Avatar
Career record: 92-61
Season: 22-21 (#4760)
Bankroll: $1,945 (#3603)
Location: New Jersey
2
38 posts
Joined 4/07
i like the cage cause it avoids the fight constantly getting stopped and moved to the center of the ring....

Post #13   4/17/07 8:01:32PM   

shinobi
MMA Regular

shinobi Avatar
Career record: 105-49
Season: 1-0 (#9037)
Bankroll: $1,025 (#7551)
Location:
8
128 posts
Joined 4/07
Cage, i know its not better live, but fighters rely on momentum of takedowns etc to finish fights, plus, it seperates it from pro wrestling and boxing, also, every fighter has the same advantage and disadvantage of the cage. they need to get used to it. people fall through the ropes of the ring, or they go under and get stood back up or put in the center allowing mini breaks and time to think or lose momentum.

Post #14   4/17/07 11:09:54PM   

Jeffanori-Gomi
Standup Guy

Career record: 34-26
Season: 0-0 (#-)
Bankroll: $1,000
Location:
Camp: TAPOUT
24
470 posts
Joined 1/07
If the UFC allows knee strikes to the head on a downed opponent then cage, if not ring

Post #15   4/19/07 12:17:35AM   
 
 
  Page 1 of 8     1     2     3     4   >>
Log In  
Username:

Password:

Keep me logged in
Sponsors