Eddie Bravo: "The Game Has Changed" |
| Posted By |
Message |
The Anti-Pansy
| 1 |  |  |
1 |
Career record: 224-121
Season: 46-24 (#721)
Location: PA
|
"A lot of fighters wanted to sit in half guard and pound them and rain elbows, but never try and pass the guard. When you have that kind of attitude, you're only going to get so far. Your game is going to be so limited and you're going to win some and lose some; you're going to bat .500 and not get very far."
Eddie Bravo
_______________________________________ People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. -George Orwell
|
|
Post #1 10/6/08 1:59:45PM
|
Laying down the beats
Career record: 192-150
Season: 37-33 (#1810)
Location: Canada
|
I'm not really knowledgable in Bravo style JJ, but doesn't mission control have the same "problems" as what he just stated?
Last edited 10/6/08 3:33PM by Rush Edit note/reason: n/a
_______________________________________ MMA Playground Ninja Moderator - Be cool and follow forum conduct or you'll be banned and all you will see is a puff of smoke. Members banned - 31, IPs banned - 19
|
|
Post #2 10/6/08 2:16:03PM
|
saemskin
BANNED
Career record: 75-70
Season: 30-23 (#4326)
Location:
|
eddie isn't a fighter, he just pioneered the rubber guard. He teaches jiu jitsu but that's his specialty. I dont see his commenting on one dimensional fighters having anything at all to do with "mission control" ? I think he's be the first to tell you it's only a piece of the puzzle.
Last edited 10/6/08 2:20PM by saemskin Edit note/reason: n/a
|
|
Post #3 10/6/08 2:19:22PM
|
Laying down the beats
Career record: 192-150
Season: 37-33 (#1810)
Location: Canada
|
Posted by saemskin
eddie isn't a fighter, he just pioneered the rubber guard. He teaches jiu jitsu but that's his specialty. I dont see his commenting on one dimensional fighters having anything at all to do with "mission control" ? I think he's be the first to tell you it's only a piece of the puzzle.
Well if he isn't a fighter then his comments don't have that much stock to MMA now do they.
What I meant by my mission control statement was that the mission control position (to me) seems to be a position where one fighter is content to be in without working for a significant positional change. That is exactly what Bravo is criticizing of these other fighters with respect to staying in half or full guard. Maybe he should criticize the fighters that try to go for rubber guard and do dick all in it or don't even do it properly.
I mean, I think there are a lot of fighters that don't pass the guard when they could or have really inactive guards themselves, but at the same time, I don't think it's due to the fact that the "game has changed." I think it has more to do with fighters' inexperience. I think it's more about fighters not having the skills to pass guard or have an effective guard, not a "new" mass approach to MMA.
Last edited 10/6/08 3:33PM by Rush Edit note/reason: n/a
_______________________________________ MMA Playground Ninja Moderator - Be cool and follow forum conduct or you'll be banned and all you will see is a puff of smoke. Members banned - 31, IPs banned - 19
|
|
Post #4 10/6/08 3:32:50PM
|
The Anti-Pansy
| 1 |  |  |
1 |
Career record: 224-121
Season: 46-24 (#721)
Location: PA
|
I thought he was making separate points - one about the value/popularity of rubber guard, and another about how you'll only be partly successful if you remain in the half-guard and try to to GnP - like Tito and Hughes of years past. There's not a lot of fighters pounding people out for a victory from the half-guard anymore - it's changed.
_______________________________________ People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. -George Orwell
|
|
Post #5 10/6/08 3:40:32PM
|
Laying down the beats
Career record: 192-150
Season: 37-33 (#1810)
Location: Canada
|
Posted by scoozna
I thought he was making separate points - one about the value/popularity of rubber guard, and another about how you'll only be partly successful if you remain in the half-guard and try to to GnP - like Tito and Hughes of years past. There's not a lot of fighters pounding people out for a victory from the half-guard anymore - it's changed.
To me, rubber guard is like the Thai clinch. Fighters see it work elsewhere and they try to do it and mess it up. Honestly, I haven't seen much success with the rubber guard in MMA as a whole and even less so than Ground and Pound from the full/half guard. A lot of fights are stopped due to strikes, even if they are not that effective, from full/half guard, but none are stopped holding a guy in rubber guard. That's the part of the interview I don't agree with. I can actually see a reason for throwing strikes from full/half guard. It works more than he is admitting and has been proven to be more effective than holding a guy in rubber guard. I also see more successful guard passes than successful rubber guards.
I'm not saying I disagree with the statement that fighters need to work on their positioning. I totally agree with that. Hell, that's obvious to anyone that understands martial arts. I just don't agree the mentality that the MMA game has changed in the last 8-10 years in that respect. There is a distribution of different fighters' skills in MMA and more often than not, I am convinced that the overall game hasn't changed in the last 8-10 years. ..... though I think it should.
Last edited 10/6/08 4:04PM by Rush Edit note/reason: n/a
_______________________________________ MMA Playground Ninja Moderator - Be cool and follow forum conduct or you'll be banned and all you will see is a puff of smoke. Members banned - 31, IPs banned - 19
|
|
Post #6 10/6/08 4:01:18PM
|
seanfu
In Full Mount
Career record: 90-55
Season: 31-19 (#5037)
Location: Fort Wayne IN
|
I love Eddie Bravo. Usually he has good things to say. But it seems like he just doesn't pay much attention to MMA anymore.
GSP got amazing WRESTLING skills. That's what has propelled him.
He was right about the evolution and champs falling cuz they stop evolving but a lot of things he said were wrong.
|
|
Post #7 10/6/08 7:31:37PM
|
Obey The Stank-Nasty
| 1 |  |  |
1 |
Career record: 144-84
Season: 43-26 (#1754)
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted by scoozna
I thought he was making separate points - one about the value/popularity of rubber guard, and another about how you'll only be partly successful if you remain in the half-guard and try to to GnP - like Tito and Hughes of years past. There's not a lot of fighters pounding people out for a victory from the half-guard anymore - it's changed.
I usually don't disagree with Rush very often but here I must disagree... To say that you see more successful guard passes than rubber guards is a flawed statement to me (i hope i paraphrased that right). Bravo is saying himself that the rubber guard isn't going to work every time and i have yet to see a fighter in a large scale organization utilize it properly. That being said some people will pound you out from half guard or full guard and some refs will stop a fight when someone is taking unanswered shots from those positions but i really don't see how that has anything to do with Eddie's comments on Rubber Guard. It is a valuable tool that really does work better than basic guard. It is easier to find yourself in a position to apply a submission when working RG (rubber guard) properly (properly being the operative word) In regard to your comment about Mission Control, i must say that usually unless the opponent knows what you are up to MC is just an ends to a mean. It is a way of securing on of your opponents arm while freeing up one of your own to set up either a triangle or a gogoplata... I think Eddie is correct, in a few years i think we'll see Rubber Guard becoming the standard, at least with fighters who are in a higher echelon of fighters.
Edit: Also in recent mma Gina Carano went to the rubber guard when it hit the mat briefly and even though it was a sloppy RG, she still almost caught a gogo almost immediately though she didn't have the rest of her opponent's body secure.
Last edited 10/7/08 1:44AM by bullettdodger Edit note/reason: n/a
_______________________________________ Rest In Peace Evan Tanner...
Props To Grappler0000 for making the Stank-A-Tar
Bas "El Guapo" Rutten: "Godspeed and Party On"
|
|
Post #8 10/6/08 7:42:17PM
|
saemskin
BANNED
Career record: 75-70
Season: 30-23 (#4326)
Location:
|
It's interesting to note that Frank Mir is training with Bravo prior to this fight with NOG, learning the rubber guard technique. There was a video posted here and the possibilites that are present when a proper rubber guard is executed are pretty amazing, at least that's the impression I got.
I really think you (rush) ought to watch it before you discount the technique or Eddie's comments for that matter. He does have a gym and trains fighters for a living, so I do think his opinons, while some dont agree with them, are valid opinoins none the less. Also, you'll notice that Joe Rogan and Goldie consult with him for his scoring during fights, or at least used to.
Lastly, if you want to see and effective rubber guard, watch some Shinya Aoki fights. Amazing. That is, if ground fighting amazes you as it does me. he choked a dude out with the rubber guard. He pulled his foot over his head and reached around behind the guys head and grabbed his foot pinching his noodle off. amazing
Last edited 10/6/08 9:06PM by saemskin Edit note/reason: n/a
|
|
Post #9 10/6/08 9:04:12PM
|
quezocrema0032
Standup Guy
| 1 |  |  |
1 |
Career record: 156-85
Season: 42-28 (#1137)
Location: YO NY
|
couture and forrest love 2 be in half gard they say it letsw them stay heavy on there opponet and keep them in place
|
|
Post #10 10/6/08 9:26:08PM
|
pharside
MMA Regular
Career record: 196-121
Season: 41-29 (#1674)
Location: Indiana
|
Eddie is so slick on the ground I'd take anything he has to say to heart
|
|
Post #11 10/6/08 11:31:25PM
|
The People's Mod
Career record: 152-91
Season: 47-23 (#137)
Location: Getting choked out or arm barred
|
There's a reason there are very few top contenders in MMA who utilize rubber guard. Rubber guard is great, but it's hard to utilize in MMA. Guys anymore are so damn strong and to hold someone in rubber guard that is that strong requires immense flexibility. It's so hard on the knees to train rubber guard that it's ridiculous.
The ruleset isn't exactly rubber guard friendly, either. Fighters have to worry about downward elbows and hitting the back of the head.
I'm not saying it can't be utilized effectively, but to do that on a consistent basis someone has to literally be a dedicated rubber guard practicioner IMO. Some day I believe it will be a staple, but not yet.
_______________________________________ "It is a shame that in this society we've been taught to judge a man's worth by what he owns instead of who he is." - Evan Tanner
|
|
Post #12 10/6/08 11:45:15PM
|
Aether
MMA Sensei
Career record: 120-82
Season: 38-23 (#2266)
Location: Canada
|
Posted by Rush
Posted by saemskin
eddie isn't a fighter, he just pioneered the rubber guard. He teaches jiu jitsu but that's his specialty. I dont see his commenting on one dimensional fighters having anything at all to do with "mission control" ? I think he's be the first to tell you it's only a piece of the puzzle.
Well if he isn't a fighter then his comments don't have that much stock to MMA now do they.
I'm not going to get into the rest of the discussion, but this isn't true at all. A person doesn't need to actually practice something themselves in order to be an expert in it. Also, practicing something doesn't make you an expert on the subject. There are a lot of fighters with little to no regard for strategy, and there are a lot of analysts who don't fight but are incredibly knowledgeable about the technical and strategic aspects of the sport.
Studying something doesn't require participation in that thing. You can become an expert by observing closely an understanding why certain tactics are and are not effective. You don't necessarily need to put it into practice yourself in order to understand it.
Personally I started training long after I started watching, and I think that I learned the vast majority of what I know long before I started training. Understanding and doing are different things.
|
|
Post #13 10/6/08 11:46:12PM
|
Laying down the beats
Career record: 192-150
Season: 37-33 (#1810)
Location: Canada
|
Posted by Aether
I'm not going to get into the rest of the discussion, but this isn't true at all. A person doesn't need to actually practice something themselves in order to be an expert in it. Also, practicing something doesn't make you an expert on the subject. There are a lot of fighters with little to no regard for strategy, and there are a lot of analysts who don't fight but are incredibly knowledgeable about the technical and strategic aspects of the sport.
Studying something doesn't require participation in that thing. You can become an expert by observing closely an understanding why certain tactics are and are not effective. You don't necessarily need to put it into practice yourself in order to understand it.
Personally I started training long after I started watching, and I think that I learned the vast majority of what I know long before I started training. Understanding and doing are different things.
First of all, I still stand by my comments.
As for the quotations above, no I disagree. To truly understand what works and what doesn't you have to practice it. If you seriously learned more prior to training then you might want to consider changing schools/teachers because in my 14 years of martial arts experience, I have never witnessed someone that knew more prior to their actual training. Saying something works because one reads it in a BJ Penn book (or something) is not the same as understanding why it works because you've tried it while the other guy was trying to hit you in the face and it either worked or didn't work. But that is beside the point I made.
The point I made was that Eddie was flat out wrong about the sport changing with respect to what "works". I never disagreed with what he said about the effectiveness of passing guard. That's how I would choose to fight. However, it doesn't mean that guys are not winning fights by not passing guard, nor does it mean that the game has changed in that respect.
I thought it was funny that he also mentioned rubber guard because the vast majority of guys that (try to) utilize rubber guard in MMA (the fights that I have seen) usually only accomplish one thing, and that is holding the guy in your guard.
I wish I had the time to watch the last 20 UFCs and count how many times rubber guard was used, how many times it was used properly/successfully vs. how many times a guy either won or advanced his position from striking within the guard. I am confident that the numbers are not even close to what Bravo was saying/thinking.
What bothered me about it was that he was insinuating that his style has significantly evolved MMA (or something to that angle). MMA has certainly evolved to incorporate different guards, rather than the classic closed guard, if Bravo said that, then I would agree with him, striking from the guard has been, is and will be a big part of the game. Unless there is a rule change, I am confident it will stay the same.
All this article was was a huge advert for his style of JJ. What the heck is he saying that JJ is the only aspect of MMA where you get exposed? Give me a break. The comments he made about Hughes just about had me dry heaving.
Last edited 10/7/08 8:56PM by Rush Edit note/reason: n/a
_______________________________________ MMA Playground Ninja Moderator - Be cool and follow forum conduct or you'll be banned and all you will see is a puff of smoke. Members banned - 31, IPs banned - 19
|
|
Post #14 10/7/08 8:51:41PM
|
Laying down the beats
Career record: 192-150
Season: 37-33 (#1810)
Location: Canada
|
Posted by bullettdodger
I usually don't disagree with Rush very often but here I must disagree... To say that you see more successful guard passes than rubber guards is a flawed statement to me (i hope i paraphrased that right). Bravo is saying himself that the rubber guard isn't going to work every time and i have yet to see a fighter in a large scale organization utilize it properly. That being said some people will pound you out from half guard or full guard and some refs will stop a fight when someone is taking unanswered shots from those positions but i really don't see how that has anything to do with Eddie's comments on Rubber Guard.
It is a valuable tool that really does work better than basic guard. It is easier to find yourself in a position to apply a submission when working RG (rubber guard) properly (properly being the operative word) In regard to your comment about Mission Control, i must say that usually unless the opponent knows what you are up to MC is just an ends to a mean. It is a way of securing on of your opponents arm while freeing up one of your own to set up either a triangle or a gogoplata...
I think Eddie is correct, in a few years i think we'll see Rubber Guard becoming the standard, at least with fighters who are in a higher echelon of fighters.
The comments on passing the guard and rubber guard are connected by the fact that Eddie was claiming his "style" was the wave of the future and that the days of striking from within the guard are long gone. Considering the fact that most of the guys can't check a kick properly, can't escape from poorly based mounts, don't know how to do a proper one leg takedown, etc. I really don't see how rubber guard is going to revolutionize MMA. Sure there are a few fighters out there that can use it well, but I don't think it will ever become mainstream and I don't think we will see a significant decline in striking from full/half guard.
IMO, Eddie was throwing a bunch of obvious statements, mixed with some BS to promote his style.
_______________________________________ MMA Playground Ninja Moderator - Be cool and follow forum conduct or you'll be banned and all you will see is a puff of smoke. Members banned - 31, IPs banned - 19
|
|
Post #15 10/7/08 9:04:27PM
|
|