Pick'em Leagues: THE BIG SHOW CASUAL BEST OF THE REST Single Event PvP: FANTASY POOLS Betting Leagues: THE BIG SHOW BEST OF THE REST

Octagon Control vs. Effort to finish

Print  
  Page 1 of 2     1     2  
Posted By Message

Jackelope

Go ahead, MOD my day

Jackelope Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:7,223
Career:864-486
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
1,202
The Rampage vs. Forrest fight got me going on this rant again last night. I knew the judges were going to score in favor of Forrest simply because of "Octagon Control" which, IMO is one of the worst ways to score a fight. It clearly favors aggressive conservatives who throw tiny jabs and worthless combos. The heavy counter striker is left praying come decision time simply because he was on the outside of the center of the Octagon. No matter if his punches did significantly more damage or not, it's all about who controlled the center of the Octagon and landed the most jabs.

As for Rampage vs. Griffin take a look at Forrest's face and take a look at Rampage's. Forrest said he wasn't hurt at all during the fight, but I saw him stagger a whole hell of a lot more than I saw Rampage. Rampage staggered when Forrest leg kicked him pretty good, but Forrest staggered from combinations in rounds 1, 3, 4, and 5.

Now, don't let this turn into a Forrest vs. Rampage debate here, but this isn't boxing. Just look at it objectively. This being only the most recent example in a long list of fights that the damage done was lopsided, but the center of the octagon was controlled by one vs. the other most of the time.

I think the UFC needs to stop scoring based on who holds the center of the Octagon and replace it straight up with "Effort to Finish" We're starting to see more and more fights going to decision in MMA because the UFC has got every single fighter worried about getting cut from the roster. So instead of trying to finish the fights they're falling into this pattern of "Land the combos, get a takedown, and win the round." Tyson Griffin even said it in his post fight interview last night. One can't blame the fighters, but it's certainly not good for business IMO.

My solution is for the UFC to remove or lower the importance of "Octagon Control" in the scoring, and significantly raise the importance of "Effort to Finish"

Ad: FanDuel: Daily Fantasy Sports

Post #1   7/6/08 12:07:41PM   

Twenty20Dollars

Heavyweight Champ

5




 
 
 


 
 
Posts:12,772
Career:1,572-1,001
Joined:Jun 2007
Chips:
1,196
effort to finish, no.

aggresion forrest won that, had rampage backing up more often than none. and octagon control.

you're telling me forrest didnt try to finish when he had the mount or when he had that triangle.

i know forrest won the fight, even though i didnt pick him to win.

Post #2   7/6/08 12:12:42PM   

Thundercats

Learning to Sprawl

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:7
Career:683-431
Joined:Mar 2007
Chips:
I enjoyed the fight very much and thought it could either way. However, Controlling the octagon means you're trying to fight and press the action...
Very risky and it should be rewarded. Hanging back and throwing counters is like fighting not to lose. Rampage's performance was very similar to when Sylvia was hw champ. A champion should fight hungry just like a contender.

Post #3   7/6/08 12:14:46PM   

Jackelope

Go ahead, MOD my day

Jackelope Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:7,223
Career:864-486
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
1,202

Posted by Twenty20Dollars

effort to finish, no.

aggresion forrest won that, had rampage backing up more often than none. and octagon control.

you're telling me forrest didnt try to finish when he had the mount or when he had that triangle.

i know forrest won the fight, even though i didnt pick him to win.



this is exactly what I said I didn't want to conversate upon. Nevermind Forrest vs. Jackson, it's just an example. Like how even though Forrest put in the footwork of aggression, once the exchanges started coming he was the one backing out and away constantly.

As for effort to finish I can't possibly see how any fan wouldn't want to see an effort to finish. I do agree with the grappling efforts to finish, though.. which is why I personally scored round 2 10-8 for Forrest.

Post #4   7/6/08 12:18:06PM   

Twenty20Dollars

Heavyweight Champ

5




 
 
 


 
 
Posts:12,772
Career:1,572-1,001
Joined:Jun 2007
Chips:
1,196
the rule just doesnt make sense. Fighters are going to have to actually throw power punches everytime for them to score points instead of leg kicks and jabs.

Post #5   7/6/08 12:24:05PM   

juanez13

P4P

juanez13 Avatar
2

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:4,334
Career:575-288
Joined:Jul 2007
Chips:
767
Rampage only threw like one combo per round, the rest was all Forrest, so i dont see just one effort in a round wins him that round, while the other fighter did more most of the round.



Last edited 7/6/08 12:31PM server time by juanez13
Edit note/reason: n/a
3 total post edits

Post #6   7/6/08 12:25:24PM   

Jackelope

Go ahead, MOD my day

Jackelope Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:7,223
Career:864-486
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
1,202
Not true at all. The jab is fine, and so are leg kicks. As a matter of fact I'm a huge fan of jabs and leg kicks. But if you're using them to tag and move instead of setting up combinations or finishing combinations I don't agree with them being as significant as someone who is throwing worthwhile combos and hurting his opponent with them. I am just deathly afraid of this turning into the Lennox Lewis boxing years for the UFC.



Post #7   7/6/08 12:30:03PM   

cmill21

Heavyweight Champ

cmill21 Avatar
2

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:6,489
Career:444-230
Joined:May 2007
Chips:
742
Machida is a perfect example! Was he trying to finish tito(other then when he dropped him), or was he simply trying to get the decsion? I think he was trying to get the decision, and i've liked him alot longer then most people here have known he exsisted. I personally think the scoring system and what they judge on is not a good way to go about it. I hate to go to the Pride way of judging, but other then a few obvious home town decisions they got most of the close fights right based on their system.

Post #8   7/6/08 12:34:51PM   

RandyCouture

MMA Regular

RandyCouture Avatar
16
 
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:216
Career:1,524-786
Joined:Aug 2007
Chips:
16
I was piss drunk at the bar and all 4 of my friends could c that forrest clearly won that fight. IMO I scored it 49 46 forrest but giving him 10 8 the 1 round but i can c clearly how judges could score the fight 48 47 i thought this fight was clearly given to the victor.

Post #9   7/6/08 12:50:51PM   

Jackelope

Go ahead, MOD my day

Jackelope Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:7,223
Career:864-486
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
1,202
Again, this topic is not about Griffin vs. Rampage. This topic is about the rule system that the UFC has in place for scoring fights. It applies in the situation of Griffin vs. Rampage, but it is NOT about Griffin vs. Rampage.

Post #10   7/6/08 12:53:15PM   

cmill21

Heavyweight Champ

cmill21 Avatar
2

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:6,489
Career:444-230
Joined:May 2007
Chips:
742

Posted by RandyCouture

I was piss drunk at the bar and all 4 of my friends could c that forrest clearly won that fight. IMO I scored it 49 46 forrest but giving him 10 8 the 1 round but i can c clearly how judges could score the fight 48 47 i thought this fight was clearly given to the victor.



Not the right thread but ok.

Ad: FanDuel: Daily Fantasy Sports

Post #11   7/6/08 12:53:39PM   

Mastodon2

MMA Sensei

Mastodon2 Avatar
1
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:1,997
Career:188-114
Joined:Mar 2007
Chips:
211
Bravo to Jackelope, he continues to exemplify the minority of MMA fans with common sense. I totally agree with him that "Octagon control" needs to go way down the agenda and "effort to finish" way up, though the UFC will likely not do this as it would ruin the wrestling bias the UFC rule set has traditionally had.

I have seen someone state that fighters would have to throw "power shots" in order to score points. A combo is a combo, a jab is a jab and should be scored as such, but its when fighters start comboing and then not following up, IE, jabbing away and never progressing, or landing a combo and not progressing towards a finish, instead simply going for a takedown and running the clock, or letting the other fighter recover and resume, that fights start getting lame. I know its been said before, but MMA was so much more exciting in Pride because clock watchers knew they would get smoked by the judges, and even when the bell rang, you were not often left disappointed because solid judging and criteria fit for scoring MMA were used. Imo. the UFC's "Octagon control" is good for a wrestling match or a TKD or Karate style point scoring match like we see from Machida from time to time.

Post #12   7/6/08 12:57:26PM   

Jackelope

Go ahead, MOD my day

Jackelope Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:7,223
Career:864-486
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
1,202

Posted by Mastodon2

Bravo to Jackelope, he continues to exemplify the minority of MMA fans with common sense. I totally agree with him that "Octagon control" needs to go way down the agenda and "effort to finish" way up, though the UFC will likely not do this as it would ruin the wrestling bias the UFC rule set has traditionally had.

I have seen someone state that fighters would have to throw "power shots" in order to score points. A combo is a combo, a jab is a jab and should be scored as such, but its when fighters start comboing and then not following up, IE, jabbing away and never progressing, or landing a combo and not progressing towards a finish, instead simply going for a takedown and running the clock, or letting the other fighter recover and resume, that fights start getting lame. I know its been said before, but MMA was so much more exciting in Pride because clock watchers knew they would get smoked by the judges, and even when the bell rang, you were not often left disappointed because solid judging and criteria fit for scoring MMA were used. Imo. the UFC's "Octagon control" is good for a wrestling match or a TKD or Karate style point scoring match like we see from Machida from time to time.



Thank you. Yet another long time MMA fan with a solid knowledge base chiming in. I only hate that you and Cmill are from my camp because it makes it look like you're agreeing based on camp status and not common sense.

Yourself, myself, and Cmill can all agree because we're all practicioners that know what an effective combination is and feels like.

On a side note for ya Mastodon, since your love of striking far surpasses mine- that right uppercut counter that dropped Forrest in rd 1 brought a tear to my eye. That was an awesome display of a perfect counter

Post #13   7/6/08 1:08:17PM   

ICSlegend

MMA Regular

ICSlegend Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:237
Career:56-40
Joined:Mar 2008
Chips:
26
Nice analysis guys. Very true.

It's disgusting that UFC is catering to the drunk bar fan mentality of favoring fighters who just attack more and move forward.

On Jackson Vs Griffin, which is a perfect example of this -

Jackson left no doubt in my mind that he was technically the better fighter last night. He didn't attack often, but when he did he connected, and even dropped Griffin. Whereas Griffin attacked plenty, but couldn't hit Page Don't know why people even say it's a close fight, guess because of Round 2, and even then Rampage was never in any danger of being finished, so I fail to see how that is a 10-8 round. Controlled yes, dominated? Nowhere close.

A couple of good leg kicks shouldn't win you a fight. How many hits did Griffin actually LAND flush? 10? And even then didn't do any damage aside from the 3 or 4 to the leg. Just look at the post-fight pics.

Post #14   7/6/08 1:14:53PM   

Aether

Heavyweight Champ

Aether Avatar
4



 
 
 


 
 
Posts:5,068
Career:946-506
Joined:Apr 2007
Chips:
1,039
I've been saying the same thing for a long time. I always thought that the PRIDE criteria was better. The actual judging may have been questionable, but their list of judging criteria in order of importance was pretty much bang on.

I'm also a big fan of the red/yellow card system. I think having this in place combined with the judging criteria ensured that most fight maintained a relatively fast pace throughout.

I think that fightmetrics is a good concept for scoring MMA fights. Obviously it's pretty rudimentary as is, but a scoring system of a similar nature that takes all of the different facets of MMA into account and scores them comprehensively is an amazing idea and something that needs to happen in the sport. Judges have a strange position. From what I know many of them came directly over from boxing and kickboxing with absolutely no knowledge of things like jiu jitsu (cecil peoples is a good example) while I know that there have also been very knowledgeable judges like stephen quadros the fact that any number of people without comprehensive knowledge of the sport are making decisions without having to account for their decisions or offer any sort of explanation for their judgment seems very wrong to me.

It was good enough when MMA was trying to prove to the world that it's not human cockfighting but now that it's pretty popular and widely accepted I think it's time to separate the sport from boxing completely. They're two different things, and they need different scoring systems as well as different judges.

Post #15   7/6/08 1:18:46PM   
 
  Page 1 of 2     1     2