Pick'em Leagues: THE BIG SHOW CASUAL BEST OF THE REST Single Event PvP: FANTASY POOLS Betting Leagues: THE BIG SHOW BEST OF THE REST
  MMA Playground 4.0 is live!     Returning members: check out the patch notes     New members: visit our getting started guide, read the FAQ's and start playing!

Matt Lindland Claims That UFC Contracts Are Illegal

Print  
Posted By Message

snakerattle79

BANNED

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:72
Career:-
Joined:Jun 2008
Chips:
17
http://www.mmanews.com/other/Matt-Lindland-Claims-That-UFC-Contracts-Are-Illegal.html

Republican House of Representatives candidate and - of course - highly respected middleweight Matt Lindland believes there is something very wrong with the contracts from MMA’s top organization.

The UFC contracts are illegal. Based on the Muhammad Ali (Safety) Act, you cannot be the promoter and the manager at the same time,” Lindland said, “If they are telling you who and when you are going to fight, they are the manager as well as the promoter.”

I am definitely not a lawyer so it is hard to fully judge the validity of the statement, but in reading the Act, Lindland does make a few good points on how much control an organization can have over a fighter.

Lindland also said that one fighter in particular is planning to test the Act in court.

I believe that is what Randy (Couture) is saying as well.”

Post #1   7/6/08 9:37:57AM   

Purge

Standup Guy

Purge Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:296
Career:562-312
Joined:Dec 2007
Chips:
38
Funny that he only came out and said all of this, AFTER Couture and Ortiz left.

Post #2   7/6/08 3:25:40PM   

prie5t

Learning to Sprawl

prie5t Avatar
1
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:21
Career:849-453
Joined:Jan 2008
Chips:
5
UFC contracts have been questionable for a while now, they're ridiculously one sided and unfair and in some cases not even worth the paper there written on being that they can cut you at any time whether it's your first or last fight on your contract.
Although i'm not 100% sure, I don't think the contracts aren't illegal under the Ali act as I believe MMA doesn't come under the Ali act but if the laws were changed I would say most if not all of Zuffa contracted fighters could become free agents.

Like I said I could be wrong but there was some discussion on one of the MMA forums awhile ago about it. Whether illegal or not I do think there extremely unfair.

Post #3   7/21/08 6:43:18PM   

hippysmacker

Boondock Saints Mod

hippysmacker Avatar
6





 
 
 


 
 
Posts:5,234
Career:1,902-1,070
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: Nutthuggers Suck
Chips:
611

Posted by prie5t

UFC contracts have been questionable for a while now, they're ridiculously one sided and unfair and in some cases not even worth the paper there written on being that they can cut you at any time whether it's your first or last fight on your contract.
Although i'm not 100% sure, I don't think the contracts aren't illegal under the Ali act as I believe MMA doesn't come under the Ali act but if the laws were changed I would say most if not all of Zuffa contracted fighters could become free agents.

Like I said I could be wrong but there was some discussion on one of the MMA forums awhile ago about it. Whether illegal or not I do think there extremely unfair.



While I agree that some of the UFC's new contact stuff( about the licensing rights) is fishy myself, I think you maybe misunderstand , or just heard wrong some of the things in a UFc contract. Unless its a new fighter with no pull, who I think should really have to prove themselves until they have more pull, the cutting part at least is wrong. Take Cro-cop for exmaple. They couldn't just cut him, unless he lost 3 in a row. They did have a provision that if he lost 2 in a row, that they could cut his salary ( I beleive it was 350k and cut to 175k) in half. They instead mutually agreed to let him out of his deal according to Mirko . Their are also morality & business practices clauses, which Lindland violated by being sponsored by a gambling company. I have no problem with either , as long as they have escalator clauses when a guy keeps winning impressively. I have read that they have been doing so, and that their options in a lot of the contracts in the last 2 years have high prices. They also pay bonuses they don't need to , like the 500k they gave Randy for free, that he denied and was proven wrong when they produced the proof. He also denied receiving a 500k signing bonus which he was also proven wrong on. He backtracked then , and said he misunderstood the contract. Whatever the case, he is probably the worst possible example for Lindland to use, and the UFC/Linland have shown they have grudges against each other IMO. I personally wouldn't give much credence to anything wither says about the other, as I think both have shown they will say whatever they think will get them what they want sometimes.
Now I think there are many contracts, and many details of which us fans are unaware, and you may have some other points about their contract practices which I mentioned. What I do know for sure si they won both times fighters filed lawsuits against their contract practices( BJ and Randy) and so those at least weren't illegal. From what I heard the new licensing right contracts are based on the WWF's and the the WWF won the challenges to them in the past. Most notably Hulk Hogan and the ultimate warrior lost these. Anyway, there may be something to the UFC having some one sided ethics in their contracts, but illegal? Without proof , and history has shown us they haven't been, I think Lindland is just pursuing his personal agenda again.

Last edited 7/22/08 5:19AM server time by hippysmacker
Edit note/reason: n/a

_______________________________________
“Never violate a woman, nor harm a child. Do not lie ,cheat ,or steal.for selfish gain. These things are for lesser men. Protect the weak against the evil strong. And never allow thoughts of gain to lead you into the pursuit of evil. Never back away from an enemy. Either fight or surrender. It is not enough to say I will not be evil. Evil must be fought wherever it is found.”
The Iron Code

Post #4   7/21/08 10:54:41PM   

Purge

Standup Guy

Purge Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:296
Career:562-312
Joined:Dec 2007
Chips:
38
Agreed with hippysmacker, Ortiz was said to have earned at least 5 million in 2006, from PPV alone. Also Lindland was negotiating a possible signing last year, but obviousdly the UFC didn't want him. Trashing the organization's integrity, might be one of his ignorant ways of fighting back.

Post #5   7/23/08 3:28:30AM   

jocksmall

In Full Mount

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:518
Career:213-134
Joined:Jan 2007
Chips:
29
i also agree that the contracts are legal but very one sided at times. if its true the ufc has 300 fighters they can never make enough fights to feed them all and they are not allowed to fight elsewhere

Post #6   7/23/08 9:15:50PM   

mk1630

Standup Guy

mk1630 Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:381
Career:375-217
Joined:May 2007
Chips:
28
Its not like he's just upset they wont sign him right??

Post #7   7/25/08 1:02:00AM   

cmill21

Heavyweight Champ

cmill21 Avatar
2

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:6,489
Career:444-230
Joined:May 2007
Chips:
742

Posted by mk1630

Its not like he's just upset they wont sign him right??



Did you see his Affliction Salary? Guessing he doesn't care that the UFC won't sign him lol. According to John Salley they are lol, he says as an American you should be able to do what you want and the corperation shoulden't be able to have any say over your life. I somewhat agree as long as it doesn't intefere with your contractual obligations, but then when you see the UFC pulling fights until guys resign I get pissed off.

Post #8   7/25/08 1:18:24AM   

mk1630

Standup Guy

mk1630 Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:381
Career:375-217
Joined:May 2007
Chips:
28

Posted by cmill21


Posted by mk1630

Its not like he's just upset they wont sign him right??



Did you see his Affliction Salary? Guessing he doesn't care that the UFC won't sign him lol. According to John Salley they are lol, he says as an American you should be able to do what you want and the corperation shoulden't be able to have any say over your life. I somewhat agree as long as it doesn't intefere with your contractual obligations, but then when you see the UFC pulling fights until guys resign I get pissed off.



Haha touche'

Post #9   7/25/08 1:32:40AM