MMA Playground
  Home   My Playground   MMA Forums   Stats & Data   MMA News   MMA Videos   Fighter Rankings   Secondary League   About/Info   Create Account  
Forum Index Today's Topics Unanswered Topics Search My Props Member Directory Premium Members Recent Polls Subscribed Topics Website Rules
 

What do you find more entertaining? "Bad Blood" or "Good Sports"...???

What's more entertaining to watch for you?
Forum Opinion Poll
Good Sports 19 61%
Bad Blood 12 39%
 
  Page 2 of 2     1     2  
What do you find more entertaining? "Bad Blood" or "Good Sports"...???
Posted By Message

cowcatcher
MMA Sensei

cowcatcher Avatar
3


3

Career record: 223-120
Season: 49-20 (#64)
Bankroll: $35,977 (#51)
Location: Milwaukee
297
2433 posts
Joined 1/07

Posted by Trapt1nw0nder

The reason i made this thread was because alot of people bash fighters for being bad sports like Nick Diaz,BJ Penn,Tito Ortiz, and those happen to be on my top favorite fighters list. from the looks of it,it looks like 40% of you here prefer bad blood,but i think the numbers show for themselves for fights like Ortiz/Liddell 2 and Ortiz/Shamrock that most people around the world prefer Bad Blood matches even if they dont admit it and talk down on "bad sports" and wanting them out of the sport........what would be do without them?..What if there was no Mayweather in Boxing?...No Tito Ortiz in MMA? and all the other "bad sports"........so i just basically made this thread so people could stop saying stuff like "nobody needs people like that in MMA".when its still the fighters you want to watch the most.

They might be "Bad Sports",but they are Good for the Sport at the same time



the guys you mentioned sell the fights well, i dont like them that much(except bj) but i cant argue with that.

Post #16   1/10/08 4:20:34PM   
 
 
  Page 2 of 2     1     2  
Log In  
Username:

Password:

Keep me logged in
Sponsors