Pick'em Leagues: THE BIG SHOW CASUAL BEST OF THE REST Single Event PvP: FANTASY POOLS Betting Leagues: THE BIG SHOW BEST OF THE REST

Whats The Worst Decision In UFC/Pride

Print  
  Page 1 of 6     1     2     3     4   >>
Posted By Message

Sam_Rothstein

Belt Contender

Sam_Rothstein Avatar
5




 
 
 


 
 
Posts:955
Career:950-555
Joined:Mar 2007
Chips:
65
I always wondered what people thought was the worst decision in ufc/pride

a lot of fights have been written off as bad decisions such as bj penn vs gsp and rampage vs ninja rua and more recently michael bisping vs matt hamill.

So what do you think was the worst decision you have ever seen the judges make in UFC or Pride?

Post #1   10/30/07 4:46:06AM   

Sam_Rothstein

Belt Contender

Sam_Rothstein Avatar
5




 
 
 


 
 
Posts:955
Career:950-555
Joined:Mar 2007
Chips:
65
I will start it off


I vote michael bisping vs matt hamill

Post #2   10/30/07 4:47:27AM   

Khaos

TUF 2 Alternate

Khaos Avatar
3


 
 
 


 
 
Posts:1,830
Career:2,491-1,816
Joined:Jun 2007
Camp: Men of the hour
Chips:
206

Posted by Sam_Rothstein

I will start it off


I vote michael bisping vs matt hamill



I second this guy 100%

Post #3   10/30/07 5:07:35AM   

hippysmacker

Boondock Saints Mod

hippysmacker Avatar
7
 
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:5,237
Career:1,959-1,110
Joined:Jan 2007
Camp: Nutthuggers Suck
Chips:
611
Personally I feel GSP definitely won rounds 2 and 3 vs Penn, so that's out for me. I will say Ricco vs Nog was the worst decision in Pride and Vitor vs Tito was bad in the UFC. Ricco won all rounds IMO, and that was just Pride judges defending their turf. Vitor dropped Tito in the first and clearly won the 2nd to me.

_______________________________________
“Never violate a woman, nor harm a child. Do not lie ,cheat ,or steal.for selfish gain. These things are for lesser men. Protect the weak against the evil strong. And never allow thoughts of gain to lead you into the pursuit of evil. Never back away from an enemy. Either fight or surrender. It is not enough to say I will not be evil. Evil must be fought wherever it is found.”
The Iron Code

Post #4   10/30/07 6:34:02AM   

jomatty

In Full Mount

jomatty Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:767
Career:137-79
Joined:Jul 2007
Camp: bet the rent
Chips:
58
i second the ricco vs nog vote. that was really bad imo.

Post #5   10/30/07 7:49:04AM   

thepunisher

In Full Mount

thepunisher Avatar
1
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:585
Career:338-213
Joined:Feb 2007
Camp: MMA Weekly
Chips:
39
Ninja VS Rampage was bad even Rampage thought he lost

Post #6   10/30/07 8:03:17AM   

garrick

MMA Regular

garrick Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:103
Career:222-122
Joined:Mar 2007
Camp: Pitbulls
Chips:
2
Hamill vs. Bisping hands down. I'll say it again, Hamill got ripped off!

Post #7   10/30/07 10:00:19AM   

tuvok500

GSP will Comeback JUMP !!!

tuvok500 Avatar
33
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:2,245
Career:2,009-1,021
Joined:Jun 2007
Camp: Canadian Power Team
Chips:
314
Hamill / Bisping !!! worse decision EVER !!! LOL

Post #8   10/30/07 10:29:09AM   

atlas777

Standup Guy

atlas777 Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:292
Career:577-375
Joined:Oct 2007
Camp: Minnesota MMA Maulers
Chips:
14
Hammil vs Bisping was the worst decision ever in the UFC, but Tito Ortiz vs Forrest Griffin was a horrible one as well.

Post #9   10/30/07 10:49:33AM   

loonytnt

MMA Sensei

loonytnt Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:2,363
Career:299-241
Joined:Jul 2007
Camp: Diaz Fan Club
Chips:
158
hammil is #1 but i didnt here clay vs tyson yet? i think that one was bad too

Post #10   10/30/07 11:14:15AM   

MMAnomale

MMA Regular

MMAnomale Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:168
Career:155-77
Joined:Aug 2007
Chips:
11
Tito vs. Forrest was bad, but nowhere near as bad as the Hamil/Bisping decision. That was ludicrous.

Post #11   10/30/07 12:09:32PM   

jgordon85

MMA Regular

jgordon85 Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:210
Career:1,768-1,176
Joined:Mar 2007
Camp: Team Twisted
Chips:
4
hamill vs bisping of course is first.
guida vs griffin i do not know what fight they were watching.

Post #12   10/30/07 12:13:24PM   

TNunley

Belt Contender

TNunley Avatar
2

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:871
Career:120-77
Joined:Jul 2007
Camp: Team Arse Kickers
Chips:
115
I personally feel the Tito/Forrest fight wasn't a bad decision after watching it... it was a close fight either way you look at it, so even if Tito wasn't the "clear" winner... it would be difficult to rank it anywhere close to the worst decision ever.

The one fight where I think the only person who doesn't disagree with the judge's decision was the fighter.... Bisping/Hammill. I don't think there is probably 2 other people in the world besides Bisping himself who actually feels he won that fight.

Post #13   10/30/07 12:14:41PM   

HulkRage

Standup Guy

HulkRage Avatar
 
 
 


 
 
Posts:334
Career:1,211-825
Joined:Sep 2007
Camp: Mountain Top Fight Camp
Chips:
17

Posted by hippysmacker

Personally I feel GSP definitely won rounds 2 and 3 vs Penn, so that's out for me. I will say Ricco vs Nog was the worst decision in Pride and Vitor vs Tito was bad in the UFC. Ricco won all rounds IMO, and that was just Pride judges defending their turf. Vitor dropped Tito in the first and clearly won the 2nd to me.



I agree 100%. Ricco and Vitor were both robbed.

Post #14   10/30/07 12:18:10PM   

liddel4prez

Learning to Sprawl

 
 
 


 
 
Posts:15
Career:31-28
Joined:Feb 2007
Chips:
1
Randleman/Bas

Post #15   10/30/07 1:42:29PM   
 
  Page 1 of 6     1     2     3     4   >>