WEC 49 Results/Discussion (Spoilers)

MMAPlayground.com » MMA General » Spoilers Forum » WEC 49 Results/Discussion (Spoilers)
« Previous Page | Next Page »
Shawn91111
6/20/10 11:33:41PM
Im not understanding why he keeps going for the inside kick. It was obvious the 3rd one hit Varner square.
Twenty20Dollars
6/20/10 11:33:54PM
"that doesn't tickle"
grappler0000
6/20/10 11:33:55PM
I was under the opinion that he would be required to take a point this time...am I missing something?
BlueSkiesBurn
6/20/10 11:34:43PM
Varner will be changing his name after this fight. Hence forth, he'll be known as Jaime "Iron C*ck" Varner.
Jshep714
6/20/10 11:35:12PM
I thought it was an automatic DQ after a point deduction.

Can someone clear this up?
Twenty20Dollars
6/20/10 11:35:55PM
if kamal hurt his hand he needs to keep using his kicks
Shawn91111
6/20/10 11:37:17PM
Its only a DQ if Varners D*ck falls off.
grappler0000
6/20/10 11:37:25PM

Posted by Jshep714

I thought it was an automatic DQ after a point deduction.

Can someone clear this up?



I believe it's point, point, DQ.
BlueSkiesBurn
6/20/10 11:38:01PM


NAC 467.7964 Fouls: Deduction of points. (NRS 467.030) 1. If an unarmed combatant fouls his opponent during a contest or exhibition of mixed martial arts, the referee may penalize him by deducting points from his score, whether or not the foul was intentional. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2 of NAC 467.698, the referee may determine the number of points to be deducted in each instance and shall base his determination on the severity of the foul and its effect upon the opponent. 2. When the referee determines that it is necessary to deduct a point or points because of a foul, he shall warn the offender of the penalty to be assessed. 3. The referee shall, as soon as is practical after the foul, notify the judges and both unarmed combatants of the number of points, if any, to be deducted from the score of the offender. 4. Any point or points to be deducted for any foul must be deducted in the round in which the foul occurred and may not be deducted from the score of any subsequent round. (Added to NAC by Athletic Comm’n by R070-01, eff. 8-31-2001; A by R076-03, 12-3-2003) NAC 467.7966

Fouls: Accidental. (NRS 467.030) 1. If a contest or exhibition of mixed martial arts is stopped because of an accidental foul, the referee shall determine whether the unarmed combatant who has been fouled can continue or not. If the unarmed combatant’s chance of winning has not been seriously jeopardized as a result of the foul and if the foul did not involve a concussive impact to the head of the unarmed combatant who has been fouled, the referee may order the contest or exhibition continued after a recuperative interval of not more than 5 minutes. Immediately after separating the unarmed combatants, the referee shall inform the Commission’s representative of his determination that the foul was accidental. 2. If the referee determines that a contest or exhibition of mixed martial arts may not continue because of an injury suffered as the result of an accidental foul, the contest or exhibition must be declared a no decision if the foul occurs during: (a) The first two rounds of a contest or exhibition that is scheduled for three rounds or less; or (b) The first three rounds of a contest or exhibition that is scheduled for more than three rounds. 3. If an accidental foul renders an unarmed combatant unable to continue the contest or exhibition after: (a) The completed second round of a contest or exhibition that is scheduled for three rounds or less; or (b) The completed third round of a contest or exhibition that is scheduled for more than three rounds, Ê the outcome must be determined by scoring the completed rounds and the round during which the referee stops the contest or exhibition. 4. If an injury inflicted by an accidental foul later becomes aggravated by fair blows and the referee orders the contest or exhibition stopped because of the injury, the outcome must be determined by scoring the completed rounds and the round during which the referee stops the contest or exhibition. (Added to NAC by Athletic Comm’n by R070-01, eff. 8-31-2001; A by R076-03, 12-3-2003; R090-07, 12-4-2007)

grappler0000
6/20/10 11:38:25PM

Posted by Shawn91111

Its only a DQ if Varners D*ck falls off.



It might be close...keep an eye on it.
Twenty20Dollars
6/20/10 11:39:59PM
varner balls are prolly in his stomach after the 3rd kick
BlueSkiesBurn
6/20/10 11:40:37PM
NAC 467.695 Fouls: Disqualification; withholding of purse. (NRS 467.030) An unarmed combatant guilty of a foul in a contest or exhibition may be disqualified by the referee and his purse ordered withheld by a Commissioner or the Commission’s representative. Disposition of the purse and the penalty to be imposed upon the unarmed combatant will be determined by the Commission.
kopower
6/20/10 11:41:43PM
Varner is sooo dramatic. I think that's a big part why people have a problem with him.
BlueSkiesBurn
6/20/10 11:42:05PM


******* PEOPLES
grappler0000
6/20/10 11:42:21PM
WTF
Twenty20Dollars
6/20/10 11:42:39PM
hahaha I can live with a draw
lohmann
6/20/10 11:43:16PM
Lol?
kopower
6/20/10 11:43:18PM
29-27 Shalorus ????
Jshep714
6/20/10 11:43:47PM
Umm... WOW I have lost all faith in MMA judging now.
grappler0000
6/20/10 11:44:04PM

Posted by Twenty20Dollars

hahaha I can live with a draw



You picked Shalorus didn't you?
BlueSkiesBurn
6/20/10 11:44:11PM
Broken hand, busted c*ck, and now a draw, this has been a rough night for Varner.
Shawn91111
6/20/10 11:44:17PM
Come on with these decisions.
AchillesHeel
6/20/10 11:44:21PM

Posted by kopower

29-27 Shalorus ????


That was my reaction too. F'ing bizarre scoring of this fight.
lohmann
6/20/10 11:44:28PM
Somebody should tell the judges that punishment delivered to the crotch doesn't count as "damage" on the judges' criteria.
BlueSkiesBurn
6/20/10 11:45:41PM

Posted by lohmann

Somebody should tell the judges that punishment delivered to the crotch doesn't count as "damage" on the judges' criteria.




kopower
6/20/10 11:47:18PM
What a crappy way to end an awesome night of fights. Still thought the card was one of the best WEC events ever though.

Bedtime for me. Have a good night playgrounders
ncordless
6/20/10 11:48:00PM
I can see a 28-28 draw since no point was taken in the third, but a 29-27 for Kamal is ridiculous.
BlueSkiesBurn
6/20/10 11:48:26PM
The fight itself didn't suck. Just the decision. Personally, I thought the fight was very entertaining.
ncordless
6/20/10 11:52:27PM
I loved this card... not only did it deliver big action and quality fighting, it also reset the 145lb. division. I'd love to see Grispi or Hominick fight for a title soon.
lohmann
6/20/10 11:54:14PM

Posted by ncordless

I loved this card... not only did it deliver big action and quality fighting, it also reset the 145lb. division. I'd love to see Grispi or Hominick fight for a title soon.



I think Hominick will probably end up being matched up against the winner of Jung vs. Garcia in what will be a fun fight.

Grispi seems a little farther ahead in his push for a title. Beating LC Davis was a big deal, and I expect Grispi to get a match against Mike Brown while Aldo and Gamburyan fight each other.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
Related Topics