I like Brian Geraghty as the sleeper. I think Wiman is soft.
Posted by BerndRealBad
I like Brian Geraghty as the sleeper. I think Wiman is soft.
While I wouldn't be shocked if Geraghty won, what would ever give you the indication that Wiman was soft? Maybe I missed something.
Posted by szucconi
His training is listed and it is also funny.
"TRAINING: wake up 6:30 am train boxing and do conditioning. Take a long break and cat nap. Come back at 6:00 pm train grappling and MMA for 2 hours. Last, I hit the weight room for weight training. Meditate for 5 to 6 seconds. Eat two boxes of Snickers ice cream bars. Then have a poop and a nap."
Posted by BerndRealBad
This might be true, the 0-3 mark against fighters with more than one pro fight, but look who those fighters are. He lost a decision to Huerta, was hanging with Fisher into that knee. Also if you count his fight with Manny, it was even until Manny just kept him down but still couldn't put him away. Must be the extra snickers bars.
Posted by szucconi
Geraghty beat a guy that fought at WEC 26, IMO that is better then losing to to Spencer Fisher.
Posted by NME
Posted by szucconi
Geraghty beat a guy that fought at WEC 26, IMO that is better then losing to to Spencer Fisher.
Yeah, but Tommy Lee is a featherweight. It's tough to give a guy credit for beating someone a weight class below himself.
Posted by szucconi
But it was a win. Geraghty has wins against people with winning records. Wiman doesn't have a single win against anyone with any record. David Franks is the only win under Wimans belt that went on to have any more fights.
Posted by NME
Posted by szucconi
But it was a win. Geraghty has wins against people with winning records. Wiman doesn't have a single win against anyone with any record. David Franks is the only win under Wimans belt that went on to have any more fights.
Let me tell you a story regarding this sort of logic.
Back at UFC 70, I was given the lock of the century by someone whose opinion on fighting I respect. This person pointed out that Alessio Sakara had never beaten anyone with a winning record, thus Victor Valimaki was a sure thing.
Sakara defeated Valimaki, who has a winning record, via TKO in the first round.
Which isn't to say that Wiman will win, but I would advise against betting the house on Geraghty.

Posted by CornishMMA
But hey what about Wang - will he hear "beautiful wang" again? Will he listen to his corner and take Cole down? I think he will of learnt his lesson and realise he looked like an idiot, he wont wanna cry really weirdly in front of a massive crowd this time so i see him fighting a much better fight, may still pick Miller but think Wang is worth a small wager TBH


Posted by CornishMMA
But actually dude im gonna disagree with you all on who the sleeper is - ITS FLOYD SWORD - the guy has more experience with better fighters than Leites, and has fought mostly at 205 so must be big, his only losses are to Eastman and Southworth, and given how easily a small Kampman handled Thales in the standup i see this guy maybe doing similar, best odds at most likeliness IMHO
Posted by Violentcuv
I dont see Wang pulling off an upset.
I am going with Cole on that one.
But I dont think Wiman is what he is cracked up to be either..
Picking Geraghty in that fight..
Posted by nellyhiphophead
do the odds change on this sight as the fight gets closer
Posted by NME
Posted by nellyhiphophead
do the odds change on this sight as the fight gets closer
Odds can (and often do) change with all bookmakers as fights draw near because that it when most of the action takes place. If people are betting on one fighter in particular over the other, the line will move accordingly.