It seems the overwhelming concensus is to keep things the way they are which is fair enough, the majority rules after all.
I still feel 22 pts on one fight is excessive, i wouldnt be so against double points on just the fight winner (+5) but double on method, round and the exact pick bonus just feels excessive to me.
Im not too sure of the legitamacy of the statement that double points on the hot bout helps create some differentiation at the top end of the spectrum as any very close bout would do that even if only standard points were on offer but people like it so it should stay.
It is getting more and more regular to see 3+ very competitive bouts on a card and i guess i just dont like the idea of someone getting as many points from picking one less bout than someone else which is why i thought that a system more like the +2 for underdogs would make things a bit fairer but hey people dont like the idea so thats cool.
On a side note i just checked my secondary league profile and overall i am
3-11 on hot bouts, i thought that was quite humorous