Posted by hcazlekker
Haha, blasting TVs with a .44 mag seems like a decent form of anger management. I might have to try it.
DON: "Hey, Napoleon. What'd you do last summer again?"
NAPOLEON: "I told you, I spent it with my uncle in Alaska hunting wolverines!"
DON: "Did you shoot any?"
NAPOLEON: "Yes, like fifty of 'em. They kept trying to attack my cousins! What the heck would you do in a situation like that?"
DON: "What kind of gun did you use?"
NAPOLEON: "A freakin' twelve gauge, whaddya think?"



Posted by hughesfan1
The King lives !!! Sounds like loads of fun , but personally if I were shooting bear I'd rather have a high powered rifle like a 7mm mag. Blasting the TVs still sounds like a blast, nopun intended.
they're cute
Posted by loller90278
don't kill bearsthey're cute
Posted by Trapt1nw0nder
Posted by loller90278
don't kill bearsthey're cute
everytime something as insignificant as a human kills something as powerful and majestic as a bear 
Posted by Mastodon2
It makes meeverytime something as insignificant as a human kills something as powerful and majestic as a bear
There will come soft Rains
"There will come soft rains and the smell of the ground,
Ands swallows calling with their shimmering sound;
And frogs in pools singing at night,
And wild-plum trees in tremulous white;
Robins will wear their feathery fire
Whistling their whims over low fence-wire;
And not one will know of the war, not one
Will care at last when it is done.
Not one would mind, neither bird nor tree,
If mankind perished utterly;
And Spring herself, when she woke at dawn,
Would scarcely know that we were gone"
Sara Teasdale (1844-1933)
Posted by Mastodon2
Im all for defence, preserving life is cool, and anyone would do the same, but when I think of the people who go out and look for these animals just so they can kill them, in such an undignified and unfair manner it makes me : /
Dont kill without good reason y'all
Posted by Svartorm
I'm moving out to Montana in a little under two weeks, and being as we're living in bear country, I wanted to get some practice with big bore weapons to make sure I could stop a bear with accurate fire with heavy weapons. Being short a bear or two for this, I managed to pick up three TV sets for the occasion.
It was pretty sweet hitting a TV with a .44 mag and 12ga (alternating slugs and shot). The .44 mag punched fist sized holes in the screens, and the buck shot basically disintegrated anything it hit. Only downside was getting hit by ricochette when bird shot hit the wooden frame on one of the tvs, as it came back and stung me pretty good.
Overall, an excellent day of blasting televisions with high-powered weapons, a-la Elvis Presley.
Posted by pv3Hpv3p
Out of curiousity, what do you think about people that go out and kill (hunt) for more than just trophies?
What I mean is, living in MN i have a lot of friends that hunt, and every year after deer season, I eat venison for the next couple of months... As far as I know, they use as much of the deer as possible (maybe not to the extent as the native americans did), and none of them are in it "for the blood" or to bring (un-needed) suffering upon the animal...
I agree with you though, I don't condone killing an animal just for the mount or whatever, but I understand where the other half comes from as well...

Posted by Mastodon2
Im totally down with hunting for food, after all, mankind rose to its feet from hunting animals for food, and many tribes across the world still do it, but someone to go out and kill for a pelt and a head to hang on the wall is not worth it. I dont give credit to trophy hunters, because while there is an element of skill involved in hunting with modern weaponry, its still somewhat unfair on the animals.
However, when we are talking about tribes who have rites of passage where the boys must kill an animals with a sword or spear or whatever to become men, thats fair enough, because its ancient tradition, and the animal is often consumed, so credit to them for not wasting the animal, and for killing it up close where its much more a true test of raw skill.
If anyone wants to question my views I welcome it, as I enjoy learning other peopls perspectives, lets try to keep it cool though, we are all friends here and we dont need some huge argument about trophy hunting.
Posted by skiba97
I just cant see what you can get out of somthing that has no chance of defending itself, and is just trying to get along with its life like everything else. But if thats what it takes to make you feel like the dominant man that you are, then whatever. In terms of killing an animal to protect yourself, well theres just nothing else you can really do....
Posted by MethodMan
At the end of the day there is no skill and no danger in shooting an animal from a mile away with a gun, in an area you got to in motorised transport.
As to the africa thing the reason there econonmy is so messed up is that we the west keep selling there governments guns so they can fight over dwindeling resouces that we have all but plundered.
That puts the country and the people into debt and makes their lives hard, so if it is the difference between losing their traditional respect for the the animals or watching their families starve of course they are willing to let us butcher their wildlife. Lets just not be total hippercrites and ask them to thank us for it huh.
Posted by Mastodon2
As for Svartorm's point about game not being as defenseless as you might think, I totally agree! 99.9% of the time, a moose that gets shot at,and missed or not instantly crippled or killed will run, but sometimes they charge, and if you arent a good distance away they will get you, and I know I sure wouldnt want a a frightened and aggressive Bull Moose Charging at me, thats 1500lbs of hoof and horn I dont need in my personal space man!
Posted by Svartorm
Posted by Mastodon2
Im totally down with hunting for food, after all, mankind rose to its feet from hunting animals for food, and many tribes across the world still do it, but someone to go out and kill for a pelt and a head to hang on the wall is not worth it. I dont give credit to trophy hunters, because while there is an element of skill involved in hunting with modern weaponry, its still somewhat unfair on the animals.
However, when we are talking about tribes who have rites of passage where the boys must kill an animals with a sword or spear or whatever to become men, thats fair enough, because its ancient tradition, and the animal is often consumed, so credit to them for not wasting the animal, and for killing it up close where its much more a true test of raw skill.
If anyone wants to question my views I welcome it, as I enjoy learning other peopls perspectives, lets try to keep it cool though, we are all friends here and we dont need some huge argument about trophy hunting.
Oh, I'm not hunting bears, as I don't like bear meat and don't like killing predators. The thing with Montana is that its illegal to hunt bear there, so the bear populations have gotten to be rather large and bear are curious creatures, so they'll wander right into a camp site and rip your vehicles, backpacks, tents, etc to shreds, just to see whats inside them. I've already got some air horns, which should scare the shit out of a bear before it gets too close, but barring that, I have to be able to protect myself and friends from a bear if they decide to attack.
In the event that I end up killing a bear, I have to call a game warden, and he'll take care of the hide, claws, skull and meat, which gets donated to different organizations, so nothing gets wasted.
I'm taking up elk hunting for sure, and small game is legal to hunt year round on your own property, so I'll probably be dining on some rabbits, fowl, etc this summer.
