Posted by Aether
I still have to pick Silva. Sonnen definitely surprised me by dominating as badly as he did, but I still don't think he can avoid getting triangled or KOed over the course of 25 minutes.
Posted by MiniMan
To be honest, Anderson minus broken ribs = Chael getting destroyed, This fight will be over much more quickly. And yes I did see the first fight!
Still though, MAD PROPS to Sonnen for his effort.
UFC co-owner Lorenzo Fertitta told Pugmire that Silva’s bruised – NOT BROKEN – ribs will be the determining factor on when the scrap will take place.
Posted by madac
I think everybody is counting Sonnen out. Its gona go the same way as the 1st fight, but Sonnen isn’t gona get caught the 2nd time around.
Posted by madac
I think everybody is counting Sonnen out. Its gona go the same way as the 1st fight, but Sonnen isn’t gona get caught the 2nd time around.



Posted by Copenhagen
Is this the first time a challenger gets an immediate rematch for the belt?
Posted by lohmann
Posted by Copenhagen
Is this the first time a challenger gets an immediate rematch for the belt?
Rizzo vs. Couture II.
Rua vs. Machida II
Wow, I forgot about Rua/Machida.
Posted by prozacnation1978
Won't be NYE. New years day is sat this year.
My guess is feb next year. With this and shogun on shelf once again two weight classes will be held up for another 6 months or more
Ufc really needs to add another weight class. I am so tired of this
Look this year. Lesnar defended twice
Light heavy once
Gsp. Twice
Lightweight twice
Middle once. That is 8 events and right now by year end it would be 17 pay per view events. Christ not even half were title fights.
Posted by prozacnation1978
Won't be NYE. New years day is sat this year.
My guess is feb next year. With this and shogun on shelf once again two weight classes will be held up for another 6 months or more
Ufc really needs to add another weight class. I am so tired of this
Look this year. Lesnar defended twice
Light heavy once
Gsp. Twice
Lightweight twice
Middle once. That is 8 events and right now by year end it would be 17 pay per view events. Christ not even half were title fights.
Posted by CCPRIDE99
id like to see silva come out and fight like he has in the past and destroy chael
and this is getting really old
EVERYONE wants to or is getting an immediate rematch or a title shot coming off a loss now;
chael, shogun, fedor (title shot or immediate rematch), penn (AGAIN), bonnar, danzig, and rampage was supposed to get one with forrest
whether they deserve the immediate rematches or not theyre still getting quite a few of them. kind of makes me think promoters are playing favorites...hmm...
Posted by icantthinkofanything
I knew he would tap because he couldnt avoid tapping to a lesser bjj guy in Sobral.
Posted by Aether
Posted by CCPRIDE99
id like to see silva come out and fight like he has in the past and destroy chael
and this is getting really old
EVERYONE wants to or is getting an immediate rematch or a title shot coming off a loss now;
chael, shogun, fedor (title shot or immediate rematch), penn (AGAIN), bonnar, danzig, and rampage was supposed to get one with forrest
whether they deserve the immediate rematches or not theyre still getting quite a few of them. kind of makes me think promoters are playing favorites...hmm...
Well people like to throw these arguments around without actually examining the context of the situation. Look at the reason for the rematch in each fight and it will make considerably more sense than just "UFC playing favourites."
Shogun, Rampage, and BJ all beat their opponents and took a loss as a result of bad judging in some of the most controversial decisions in the history of the sport.
Fedor has lost once in over 30 fights and over a decade - I said even before he lost that whoever beats him will have to do it twice in a row, and that he is sure to be favourite in the rematch even after the loss happens. If going undefeated for over a decade doesn't earn you an immediate rematch with the person who eventually beats you what does?
As for the other fights there are strange circumstances. Bonnar got cut against Sos in a fight that was a great crowd pleaser and could have gone either way. Danzig took a submission loss as a result of a really, really terrible call by a referee when he clearly wasn't anywhere close to being submitted, and finally Sonnen is the only person in a dozen fights to even come close to challenging Silva. He dominated for something like 23 minutes and then got caught in a sub. He shocked pretty much everyone and completely dominated the guy who appeared untouchable for the last 4 years.
Again, if you examine the context of each situation it's clear why the rematches are being given. If someone challenges for the title and just outright gets their ass kicked they're obviously not getting an immediate rematch. If you take a bad decision, lose because of bad officiating, or dominate someone who seemed unbeatable for the majority of the fight you are clearly in a position where an immediate rematch is a consideration. Add to the fact that most of these guys have completely wiped their divisions clean and you have an even more compelling argument for a rematch.
Posted by Jackelope
Posted by icantthinkofanything
I knew he would tap because he couldnt avoid tapping to a lesser bjj guy in Sobral.
Let me get this straight...
You're saying Babalu Sobral is a "lesser BJJ guy" ?![]()