| Yes | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
83% | (29) |
| No | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11% | (4) |
| Undecided | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6% | (2) |
Posted by Twenty20Dollars
I didnt realize these two had fought before.
The only concievable reason is that Strikeforce wants Riggs vs. Diaz to last more than three rounds (which it probably will not), but Diaz having to defend at 170 will probably be worse than should he stay at a ~180 catchweight or middleweight and fight Robbie Lawler and/or Cung Le. Who else does Strikeforce have at 170? Dennis Hallman? Jake Shields, should Riggs win? Nick Thompson? I'm just against the creation of a title for a division that has very little to offer right now.
Posted by sclasclemski
Does anyone no what this will mean for Jake Shields? Is he moving to MW...I know him and Nick are friends and Nick doesn't fight his friends...
Posted by AnDeRsonDaSiLvA
3 rounds was too short to settle this beef . WAR DIAZ!!!!!!!!!
Posted by lohmann
There's no point in Strikeforce having this title.The only concievable reason is that Strikeforce wants Riggs vs. Diaz to last more than three rounds (which it probably will not), but Diaz having to defend at 170 will probably be worse than should he stay at a ~180 catchweight or middleweight and fight Robbie Lawler and/or Cung Le. Who else does Strikeforce have at 170? Dennis Hallman? Jake Shields, should Riggs win? Nick Thompson? I'm just against the creation of a title for a division that has very little to offer right now.
I'll pull for Riggs but pick Diaz.
Posted by mentalcase
5 rounds will definitely work in Diaz favor, cause Diaz doesn't lose he just runs out of time