Posted by codyq
The better thing is I dont pick a guy who's completely over the hill and at 9% to win a fight here, then you call the fight a "disgrace" when you dont get it right when 91% of us knew that fight was strictly a marketing fight for Couture and hardly main event worthy. You decided to pick a guy who hasnt shown anything since 2003, ya know?
Anyone can take the favorite in fights (thats what you do). Picking fights in MMA is GAMBLING. You arent "the fight professor" if you are correct on all your fight picks. ITS GAMBLING (LUCK)
MMA is unpredictable. PLUS My record is NEW, give me some time before you start bumpin your gums. When my pick record looks good, what will you say? After UFC 110 my record will look a lot better.
Everyone picked marquardt in the last event, look what happened.
You picked Manhoef
You pick favorites, dont act like you know a thing or 2.
Who said it was an exact science? not me, I'm simply pointing out your under .500 record, which most of us dont have by the way.
Dont compare Cung Le vs Smith and Manhoef vs Lawlor to Coleman vs Coleman dude, I left out a lot of your bad picks that was just one example in which you called it "disgraceful" when Randy absolutely owned a guy who didnt belong in the ring with him years after his prime.
Cung Le was a sizeable favorite (80%) and Manhoef was more than a 3:1 favorite, you cant say that about favorites when its most likely you thought they'd win too, especially since Lawler and Smith came back from major damage, especially Smith, theres no way you thought he'd win, but then again youre new so we should give you the benefit of the doubt right? get real.