Posted by bobby_loco13
doesnt matter how many rounds its sceduled for. gsp is going to knock off bj's head
Posted by The_Italian_Stallion
I think GSP is going to win and everything but this is bs!
BJ stands to gain everything if he wins but GSP gains nothing but a reaffirmation of his amazingness.
If BJ wins he gets a second belt, acclaim, the right to say the first fight was a fluke or whatever. GSP gets... a title defense!
It's not fair... I've said from the beginning this fight needs to be at a 162.5 or 165 catchweight... Heck make it a five round catchweight but not for a belt either way... there's no way to make it fair.
Posted by jae_1833
God, now I really hope GSP wins....otherwise thee LW div will be on hold forever!! A good option though would be for BJ to stay at WW if he wins (he doesn't like to stay light IMO) and open it up for a LW Grand Prix!!!
Posted by Rush
Does anyone else have a problem with this being for the WW title?
What the hell has BJ done to deserve a shot at a WW title, while at the same time not having his title on the line?
Doesn't sound right to me.
Posted by Rush
Honestly, I am curious to know how they talked GSP into it.
Posted by Rush
Why wasn't the Irvin and Silva fight for a title then?
Posted by jiujitsufreak74
Posted by Rush
Why wasn't the Irvin and Silva fight for a title then?
because it happened at 205 and neither held a title at that weight. had Anderson moved up and fought Forrest it would have been for the belt. i personally do not have a problem with BJ fighting for the title because if he beats GSP then he proves that he is in fact the best WW. idc about your recent record because if you are truly the best WW you should be the WW champion. beating GSP would prove that he is the best WW and thus would make his title victory legitimate.
Posted by Rush
Posted by jiujitsufreak74
Posted by Rush
Why wasn't the Irvin and Silva fight for a title then?
because it happened at 205 and neither held a title at that weight. had Anderson moved up and fought Forrest it would have been for the belt. i personally do not have a problem with BJ fighting for the title because if he beats GSP then he proves that he is in fact the best WW. idc about your recent record because if you are truly the best WW you should be the WW champion. beating GSP would prove that he is the best WW and thus would make his title victory legitimate.
Yeah, never mind that question, I brain farted with that one.
Ah, so by your analogy, then you have no problem with Brock or Mir getting a title shot?
What I am arguing is not whether a putative victory is legitimate, that is given, but rather is the opportunity (title shot) legit. That seems to be the issue most people have with title fights.
Not long ago, I remember people having problems with BJ getting a title shot (for the interim LW title) after beating Jens. Nobody opens their mouth now because of his wins thereafter.
So I just want to get this right, you're saying the end justifies the means?