Posted by nastshabast
Get off Bure's nuts. He blows. 0 rings.
Posted by Boo_Radley21
1. Scott Stevens
2. Roy Jones Jr.
3. Alex Ovechkin
4. Zdeno Chara
5. Marty Brodeur
Posted by DJDark41
Posted by Boo_Radley21
1. Scott Stevens
2. Roy Jones Jr.
3. Alex Ovechkin
4. Zdeno Chara
5. Marty Brodeur
Scott Stevens... just hearing that name brings me physical harm. He is, in all honesty, my second favorite player EVER. Coming from a Ranger fan thats almost sacreligious, but the man played the game like no one else. He is the reason for the phrase "Keep your head up." Brodeur, I can't dispute. The man is amazing, but unforunately for him the team playing in front of him hasn't been too good. Zdeno Chara though? Sure he's good, but I dunno if I would put him up there on the list of greats. I was actually upset when I went to a Rangers vs Boston game and Chara was scratched due to an injury. Was kinda anxious to see him play but didn't get the chance.![]()
Posted by Boo_Radley21
Posted by DJDark41
Posted by Boo_Radley21
1. Scott Stevens
2. Roy Jones Jr.
3. Alex Ovechkin
4. Zdeno Chara
5. Marty Brodeur
Scott Stevens... just hearing that name brings me physical harm. He is, in all honesty, my second favorite player EVER. Coming from a Ranger fan thats almost sacreligious, but the man played the game like no one else. He is the reason for the phrase "Keep your head up." Brodeur, I can't dispute. The man is amazing, but unforunately for him the team playing in front of him hasn't been too good. Zdeno Chara though? Sure he's good, but I dunno if I would put him up there on the list of greats. I was actually upset when I went to a Rangers vs Boston game and Chara was scratched due to an injury. Was kinda anxious to see him play but didn't get the chance.![]()
Haha well I don't think he's one of the best of all time, but I do think he's good and I like him. He's not the best but he's fun to watch. And ****** eh, Stevens is the man.
Posted by DJDark41
Posted by nastshabast
Get off Bure's nuts. He blows. 0 rings.
Just because he doesn't have any Cups doesn't mean he wasn't a fantastic player. So if Ovechkin and Crosby don't win any Stanley Cups that automatically makes them suck? I'm willing to admit that within the next 5 years, Crosby and Malkin will win a Stanley Cup. Ovechkin however, doesn't have enough good players around him to win and I don't see him leaving Washington anytime soon. But one player alone CANNOT win a Stanley Cup, so how good a player is shouldn't be judged on the number of titles won.
And about Crosby having the scoring record if he played from '80-'00... He certainly would've been a 150+ points per season guy, but I dunno if he would've touched Gretzky. Back in the day it took alot of strength and grit to play. There was none of the gently skate up the ice and deke out one guy and get a breakaway. It was much rougher, and as we've seen, every little time Crosby gets bumped he goes down, and back in the day that wouldn't cut it. The refs would've completely ignored him, and Crosby would've been roughed up and there is no way he could've taken it. Sorry, I don't agree that he would be scoring leader if he played in that timeframe.