Right now Costco is doing a deal on a 46" Sharp 1080p LCD for 799.99, and it seems like a damn good deal so I'd hate to miss out on that opportunity by waiting.
Posted by emfleek
Wal-Mart here in Fort Wayne currently has a 42" Vizio 1080p LCD for $849. I'm assuming it's a company-wide sale?
For PS3
For regular TV
For HD TV channels
General Features (2 HDMIs, Side AV and audio outputs,etc)
(leaving the country for 9 months so i rather get a new one when I get back and not just store this one in the closet all that time)
Posted by Jackelope
What is the difference between a 1080i and a 1080p? I know supposedly a 1080p is better, but I don't really understand the difference I guess. Is it refresh rate, or what?
Posted by grappler0000
Posted by Jackelope
What is the difference between a 1080i and a 1080p? I know supposedly a 1080p is better, but I don't really understand the difference I guess. Is it refresh rate, or what?
With 1080i, only every other line is refreshed with each pass, while with 1080p, all lines are refreshed with each pass. I don't know if you remember the old computer monitors that were interlaced, but it' the same concept. I would definitely recommend the 1080p.
and damn the necessity for love spreadage
Posted by Jackelope
I think I'm going to wall mount mine when I finally buy it. I think I'll get one of those little 2 1/2 foot tall by 5 foot long "tables" to put all my stuff into. Then I believe I'll run the chords up through the wall and into the back of the TV. But then again, with an Xbox and all kinds of stuff that might get complicated. So we'll see.
Posted by 40ouncetofreedom
Posted by Jackelope
I think I'm going to wall mount mine when I finally buy it. I think I'll get one of those little 2 1/2 foot tall by 5 foot long "tables" to put all my stuff into. Then I believe I'll run the chords up through the wall and into the back of the TV. But then again, with an Xbox and all kinds of stuff that might get complicated. So we'll see.
I'm pretty sure theres a plastic or rubber type thing that allows you to put all your cables into it so you dont see 546456 cables running up your wall.
Posted by 40ouncetofreedom
I'm pretty sure theres a plastic or rubber type thing that allows you to put all your cables into it so you dont see 546456 cables running up your wall.
Posted by emfleek
I'm not a fan of the wall mounting. I'd rather have it on a nice stand.
Posted by emfleek
I'm not a fan of the wall mounting. I'd rather have it on a nice stand.
Posted by AnDeRsonDaSiLvA
Edit: the difference between 1080 I and p is 1 million pixells to 2million pixells . A huge difference . Dont quote me on this but im also fairly positive 120 hertz tvs have double the lines per screen as well(compared to 60 hertz) . The difference between a plasma tv and an lcd are : plasmas have a 0.1 second respond time (while the best lcd has 4 second res time ) , plasmas have 1 million to 1 contrast ratio (while only the top of the line lcd's have this , such as the 6000$ sony xbr8 ) , plasmas are far cheaper then lcds . you can get the same quality plasma as the xbr8 for about 2000 . On paper im a plasma guy , but i cant take the risk of having to replace the tv due to burn in . Basically lcd's are just trying to catch up to plasmas . my tv is 50, 000 to 1 contrast ratio fyi . IMO don't cheap out and buy a 60 hertz 1080 P tv . Go talk to various tv salesman , dont listen to sony salesman as they will rep sony as the best obviously . Talk to salesman who dont work on commission for getting info , buy at store who does . my 2 cents .
Posted by postman
I don't know if this is true but I heard that the tv providers can't broadcast in 1080 p you will only get that from Blu-ray and hd dvd. If this is true and then unless you watch movies all the time whats the point of sending the extra cash? Hell I have a 37 in Sanyo its a 720 and I love it. I was going to get the 1080 visio but I was able to work a deal with the sales lady and walked out with that tv for 535 I was happ. I figure when prices some down I will buy a 1080 and put the 720 in the bedroom
Posted by grappler0000
Posted by AnDeRsonDaSiLvA
Edit: the difference between 1080 I and p is 1 million pixells to 2million pixells . A huge difference . Dont quote me on this but im also fairly positive 120 hertz tvs have double the lines per screen as well(compared to 60 hertz) . The difference between a plasma tv and an lcd are : plasmas have a 0.1 second respond time (while the best lcd has 4 second res time ) , plasmas have 1 million to 1 contrast ratio (while only the top of the line lcd's have this , such as the 6000$ sony xbr8 ) , plasmas are far cheaper then lcds . you can get the same quality plasma as the xbr8 for about 2000 . On paper im a plasma guy , but i cant take the risk of having to replace the tv due to burn in . Basically lcd's are just trying to catch up to plasmas . my tv is 50, 000 to 1 contrast ratio fyi . IMO don't cheap out and buy a 60 hertz 1080 P tv . Go talk to various tv salesman , dont listen to sony salesman as they will rep sony as the best obviously . Talk to salesman who dont work on commission for getting info , buy at store who does . my 2 cents .
There is no difference in pixels between a 1080i and a 1080p. In fact, 1080 is based on the number of vertical lines that the TV has. Both are 1920x1080, while 720i and 720p have a resolution of 1280x720. However the difference in a 720 TV vs a 1080 TV is 1 and 2 megapixels respectively. The difference in i-interlaced and p-progressive scan is how the lines are painted on the screen. With progressive scan, every line is written with each pass, while interlaced paints every other line on one pass and then the remaining lines on a second pass. Obviously progressive scan is the best route.
120hz TV's do not have twice the number of lines of a 60hz. Hertz refers to the refresh rate and has nothing to do with actual resolution. In this case, the 120 would refresh twice as fast as the 60. IMHO, I would not spend the extra money on the 120hz at this time. As with everything else, the price will eventually come down over time, but as of right now, unless you have money to burn, there are better things to spend that extra money on. Every unbiased review I've read pretty much agrees that the difference is barely discernible if at all.
Burn-in on Plasmas is hardly a factor these days. It was a major consideration a couple of years ago, but not so much anymore. The beauty of technology. Previously the LCD's were much higher priced for the larger TV's due to manufacturing constrictions...but as prices are much closer now along with the advancement of Plasma technology, I'm finding that it really comes down to preference and the room you'll be putting it in.Plasmas still have one distinct advantage...contrast. True black and vivid colors are better viewed on a plasma for sure. If you are planning on putting it in a room that can't avoid sunlight, I would probably go for an LCD, for better daytime viewing.

But I vote to put it on the wall