Lightweight Rankings

MMAPlayground.com » MMA General » UFC Forum » Lightweight Rankings
Geoffo
11/14/11 5:24:44PM
LINK

I came across these rankings... And I have to say fightmagazine...

ARE YOU RETARDED?

They have Gray Maynard #8 when he almost beat Edgar?
When you lose title fights, I believe you should still be #2 in the World. (assume you were #2 when you were contending).

They also have Munoz above Chael Sonnen in Middleweight Rankings.

Get your shit together.
ChrisSabal
11/14/11 6:06:46PM
yeah these ranking are absolutely terrible. Fedor above Antonio Silva, Gustafsson above Phil Davis, along with their LHW rankings basically as a whole, Belcher at 6, Stann at 20, Brenneman at 39. I could go on and on but yeah their rankings are really off.
BuffaloDave
11/14/11 6:24:53PM
It's like they were done by placing fighter's names in a hat and having a random draw.
BeeR
11/14/11 6:37:30PM
sean sherk #12
Geoffo
11/14/11 6:44:00PM

Posted by ChrisSabal

yeah these ranking are absolutely terrible. Fedor above Antonio Silva, Gustafsson above Phil Davis, along with their LHW rankings basically as a whole, Belcher at 6, Stann at 20, Brenneman at 39. I could go on and on but yeah their rankings are really off.



LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LEBEN IS 15, WHILE STANN IS 20?

Anyone remember when Stann KTFO of Leben?
This makes me somewhat mad.

Fightmagazine, you've done goof'd you noobs.
Budgellism
11/14/11 7:38:45PM

Posted by ChrisSabal

yeah these ranking are absolutely terrible. Fedor above Antonio Silva, Gustafsson above Phil Davis, along with their LHW rankings basically as a whole, Belcher at 6, Stann at 20, Brenneman at 39. I could go on and on but yeah their rankings are really off.



I'm a huge fan of Belcher and I think him at number 6 is just terrible. How do people come up with these rankings? I mean I know it's a matter of opinion most the time but some of these rankings look like they were made by people who don't even watch the sport. Stann was just in a number one contenders fight. How on earth do you justify him being at #20?
Geoffo
11/14/11 8:52:47PM

Posted by Budgellism


Posted by ChrisSabal

yeah these ranking are absolutely terrible. Fedor above Antonio Silva, Gustafsson above Phil Davis, along with their LHW rankings basically as a whole, Belcher at 6, Stann at 20, Brenneman at 39. I could go on and on but yeah their rankings are really off.



I'm a huge fan of Belcher and I think him at number 6 is just terrible. How do people come up with these rankings? I mean I know it's a matter of opinion most the time but some of these rankings look like they were made by people who don't even watch the sport. Stann was just in a number one contenders fight. How on earth do you justify him being at #20?



From looking at the site, I think they tally up votes from users. But with that said, probably a bunch of MMA haters decided to vote for random names. Brian Stann #20 haha, hes top 5.
Geoffo
11/14/11 8:54:52PM
Okay maybe not top 5.. like top 8.
Budgellism
11/14/11 9:19:04PM

Posted by Geoffo

Okay maybe not top 5.. like top 8.



Top 8 sounds about right atm.
tcunningham
11/15/11 3:23:47AM
that website will never last with shit like that.
Krazypoison
11/16/11 12:51:08PM
Fightmagazine's rankings are always horrible.
prozacnation1978
11/18/11 9:26:57AM
i honestly think ufc should do a ranking system

based on online mma sites, reporters, and more credibility mma journalism
Geoffo
11/18/11 1:12:28PM

Posted by prozacnation1978

i honestly think ufc should do a ranking system

based on online mma sites, reporters, and more credibility mma journalism



Rankings are pretty much opinions after the #1 and #2 guy most of time. UFC making a ranking system would be bad I think. Just my opinion.
KingCmb
11/18/11 1:31:22PM
the biggest question is what the hell did nog to to be above mir
Related Topics