Posted by Rush
I agree with your first point, but the second one.... huh?I don't think Karo could ever drop to LW. With his build and height, I don't see it happening.
Posted by silverbullet
Posted by Rush
I agree with your first point, but the second one.... huh?I don't think Karo could ever drop to LW. With his build and height, I don't see it happening.
come on man, did you even see Alves?? He looked bone dry compared to Karo. Alves must walk around at 200+
Karo is not even chubby. Karo is plain fat at 170. If he can't drop to LW it's bad news for him because there's no way he can be a champ at 170. No way. He's just too small. Two years ago, maybe. Two years ago dudes like Fitch, or Sanchez, or Alves fought at 185. These days, people cut, cut, cut. As the level of fighters improves, everybody is forced to cut.

Posted by AchillesHeel
It's funny when Rampage Jackson says things like "you mean I can get paid to beat up White people?" But if Forrest Griffin said the same thing about Black people, it wouldn't be.
Posted by TNunley
Posted by AchillesHeel
It's funny when Rampage Jackson says things like "you mean I can get paid to beat up White people?" But if Forrest Griffin said the same thing about Black people, it wouldn't be.
I've gotta disagree. Although it is a matter of opinion, one is no different than the other. If you don't take Page's comments as racist (and I don't), then Forrest saying the same thing about black people wouldn't be racist either. It can't be both ways, there are no double standards... only double standards of what is deemed acceptable. I really don't see how the circumstances are any different for either of them. Neither were alive during the times of slavery, and neither were around when there was segragation. So there really is no different circumstances.
Posted by TNunley
I've gotta disagree. Although it is a matter of opinion, one is no different than the other. If you don't take Page's comments as racist (and I don't), then Forrest saying the same thing about black people wouldn't be racist either. It can't be both ways, there are no double standards... only double standards of what is deemed acceptable. I really don't see how the circumstances are any different for either of them. Neither were alive during the times of slavery, and neither were around when there was segragation. So there really is no different circumstances.
Posted by AchillesHeel
Posted by TNunley
I've gotta disagree. Although it is a matter of opinion, one is no different than the other. If you don't take Page's comments as racist (and I don't), then Forrest saying the same thing about black people wouldn't be racist either. It can't be both ways, there are no double standards... only double standards of what is deemed acceptable. I really don't see how the circumstances are any different for either of them. Neither were alive during the times of slavery, and neither were around when there was segragation. So there really is no different circumstances.
ABC News, 23 September 2007: Backlash to Jena Racial Tensions?
International Herald Tribune, 10 October 2007: Rash of noose incidents reported across country in wake of Jena, La. case
New York Times, 19 October 2007: Few Answers About Nooses, but Much Talk of Jim Crow
Washington Post, 20 October 2007: In Jena and Beyond, Nooses Return as Symbol of Hate
FOX News.com, 22 October: NY Lawmakers Move on Anti-Noose Bill
New York Times, 31 March 2008: Grand Jury Investigating Noose at Colombia University
CBS 3, 1 April 2008: Discrimination Suit Filed After Noose Incident
inRich.com, 3 April 2008: Possible hate crime probed at UR
That's all from a cursory Google News search for the word "noose."
Posted by AchillesHeel
Posted by TNunley
I've gotta disagree. Although it is a matter of opinion, one is no different than the other. If you don't take Page's comments as racist (and I don't), then Forrest saying the same thing about black people wouldn't be racist either. It can't be both ways, there are no double standards... only double standards of what is deemed acceptable. I really don't see how the circumstances are any different for either of them. Neither were alive during the times of slavery, and neither were around when there was segragation. So there really is no different circumstances.
ABC News, 23 September 2007: Backlash to Jena Racial Tensions?
International Herald Tribune, 10 October 2007: Rash of noose incidents reported across country in wake of Jena, La. case
New York Times, 19 October 2007: Few Answers About Nooses, but Much Talk of Jim Crow
Washington Post, 20 October 2007: In Jena and Beyond, Nooses Return as Symbol of Hate
FOX News.com, 22 October: NY Lawmakers Move on Anti-Noose Bill
New York Times, 31 March 2008: Grand Jury Investigating Noose at Colombia University
CBS 3, 1 April 2008: Discrimination Suit Filed After Noose Incident
inRich.com, 3 April 2008: Possible hate crime probed at UR
That's all from a cursory Google News search for the word "noose."
Posted by silverbullet
Posted by Rush
I agree with your first point, but the second one.... huh?I don't think Karo could ever drop to LW. With his build and height, I don't see it happening.
come on man, did you even see Alves?? He looked bone dry compared to Karo. Alves must walk around at 200+
Karo is not even chubby. Karo is plain fat at 170. If he can't drop to LW it's bad news for him because there's no way he can be a champ at 170. No way. He's just too small. Two years ago, maybe. Two years ago dudes like Fitch, or Sanchez, or Alves fought at 185. These days, people cut, cut, cut. As the level of fighters improves, everybody is forced to cut.
Posted by Pookie
Posted by TNunley
Posted by AchillesHeel
It's funny when Rampage Jackson says things like "you mean I can get paid to beat up White people?" But if Forrest Griffin said the same thing about Black people, it wouldn't be.
I've gotta disagree. Although it is a matter of opinion, one is no different than the other. If you don't take Page's comments as racist (and I don't), then Forrest saying the same thing about black people wouldn't be racist either. It can't be both ways, there are no double standards... only double standards of what is deemed acceptable. I really don't see how the circumstances are any different for either of them. Neither were alive during the times of slavery, and neither were around when there was segragation. So there really is no different circumstances.
right because racial favoritism in the work force and the judicial system is not prominent still today. Same way with the police... and because forrest griffin was a cop it would make it even less racist, i agree![]()
Posted by Rush
Posted by silverbullet
Posted by Rush
I agree with your first point, but the second one.... huh?I don't think Karo could ever drop to LW. With his build and height, I don't see it happening.
come on man, did you even see Alves?? He looked bone dry compared to Karo. Alves must walk around at 200+
Karo is not even chubby. Karo is plain fat at 170. If he can't drop to LW it's bad news for him because there's no way he can be a champ at 170. No way. He's just too small. Two years ago, maybe. Two years ago dudes like Fitch, or Sanchez, or Alves fought at 185. These days, people cut, cut, cut. As the level of fighters improves, everybody is forced to cut.
During the broadcast it was said that Alves walks around at 190. There is a trade off for cutting weight and I think there comes a point were giving up 3-5 pounds is a better choice than cutting 3-5 extra pounds to try and have a small weight advantage over your opponent. Not only that, there is always a potential risk of not making weight, which is not a great thing either.
If you think cutting weight and dropping down is the key to a fighter's success in MMA, then I think you are short sighted. Having a size advantage only takes you so far before it will start to work against you.
Swick was considered a small MW and he did well at MW. Let's see how well he does at WW. My hunch is that he will not tear through the division as well as he did in MW. Joe Riggs is another big WW that didn't make much of a splash.
Posted by jocka
Posted by WhiteWidow
im pretty pissed houston lost and so quickly, i guess he dosnt have a chin...oh well james will be destroyed by a top 10 pretty soon,
Wow you really think that beacause Irvin knock him out with one superman punch he has a weak chin lets not forget that irvin is as big as you can be at 205 and man it was a superman punch did you think that Hugues had a weak chin when GSP knock him down with a superman punch??
Posted by whardin19
I myself would say that the Karo fight was an early stoppage. I was kinda dissapointed in it. Karo was still defending himself and this Mazigatti guy who I'm starting to not like as a ref stepped in and called the fight. I am by far not even close to being a Karo fan but that stop was bullcrap in my opinion. As for Alexander saying his fight was an early stoppage. You got to be kidding me dude! You got knocked out harcore! If your kids really do hit harder than that maybe you should start getting them trained into MMA!