anyone know? i was at BWW and couldnt hear but closed caption said 53-2 (impossible unless they gave bonus points lol) 48-12 cant be, and the other one i saw said like 50-3.
So did Hardy really get zero points in some rounds and less then the likes of Thales, and the running man?
I could see 10-8 maybe even 10-7 in one round but anything less is just ridicules.
thanks thats much much better :)
IMO every round was 10-9 GSP, he could have gotten a 10-8 for the armbar but in the other four rounds no sub attempt was close enough and nothing else was dominating enough to warrant a 10-8.
Hardy was clearly and soundly outmatched in grappling, wrestling and I felt GSP got the better of what little stand up there was.
With that said, 99% of fighters would have tapped to the armbar and clearly Hardy did much better than most anyone thought he would do. Im impressed with him and I think if he could improve his TDD and develop enough wrestling to get the fight back up, if he could do that we could see a completely different outcome.
This fight can either make him or brake him and Im hoping he patches the holes in his game and comes back stronger.
As for GSP he looks very strong and I cant wait to see who they put him in with next.
i personally saw all the rounds as 10-9 as well which is why i was stumped bye the CC i figured it was wrong thank goodness it was
Which GSP had killer instinct so we wouldn't have had to hear the scorecards
Kinda seemed like he didn't wanna hurt Hardy a bit. Then was a good time to be ruthless like Rosamar Palharas haha even tho that was definitely a dick move IMO
How would you score the Carwin/ Mir fight............oh wait ..........never mind, ya but that was not fair cuz Mir decided to take a nap suddenly.