| Yes, it bothers me alot. | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
41% | (33) |
| No, not at all. | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
50% | (40) |
| I could care less. | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9% | (7) |
Posted by cowcatcher
Posted by kingsmasher
Whens the last time GSP finished someone like Machida did Couture..>That would be never...
The only other guy ever to finish someone like that was Daniel-san, so I don't think that's a fair comparison.
Posted by kingsmasher
Posted by cowcatcher
Posted by kingsmasher
Whens the last time GSP finished someone like Machida did Couture..>That would be never...
The only other guy ever to finish someone like that was Daniel-san, so I don't think that's a fair comparison.
Silva Belfort...
Posted by State_Champ
I posted on this thread once already, but I would like to add something else: I believe GSP's opponents are also (equally) to blame for boring WW title fights.
Posted by pv3Hpv3p
Posted by DeadHead988
Amost all of GSP's recent fights have been boring as hell. I consider him the best in the world, but I never look forward to seeing him fight.
This sums it up pretty well... After the "flukey" loss to Serra, he just won't put himself out there... And in the end, that's why I love combat sports... In its base form, it's two guys baring all against one and other until a natural breaking point.
I guess what really bothers me, is that is seems like GSP has all the tools to finish all his fights... He is head and shoulders above anyone in the WW division... But his lack of ability to pul the trigger, is frustrating to say the least...
I mean, what's the worst that could happen? He loses a fight? Big deal... He's already solidified himself as the best welterweight in MMA up to this point...
Ah, whatever... like you say... Best in the world, but I could careless about seeing him fight...

Posted by CoachRDS
I don't have a problem with GSP's gameplan because IMO finishes are not as indicative of a fighter's skills as being able to control where and how a fight goes. If Georges St. Pierre can make someone like Josh Koscheck be a human punching bag and the opponent can't stop it but doesn't get knocked out because of having a good chin, does that mean his opponent lacks stand up skills? No. It means he could not fight his fight, and the other guy was superior as a stand up fighter. Likewise, if he is able to take down someone like Dan Hardy, control him on the mat and go for submissions and the opponent refuses to tap, does that mean a fighter doesn't have submission skills? No. It means the guy on bottom, while refusing to get finished, got outclassed in his weak area by a fighter who was superior in that area. His gameplans are built around him trying to finish fights, but if you are fighting in the UFC's welterweight division, you should not expect much in the way of finishes because everyone is skilled in all areas of the fight game.
Posted by KungFuMaster
GSP does not fight to hurt his opponents.
GSP's fight with Koscheck proved he could have knocked out or tko Koscheck but sympathy kept him from unleashing what he is really capable of doing in the octagon.
GSP is actually holding back from delivering punishing injuries to his opponents.
His philosophy is to win and not to inflict major injuries to his opponents.
Posted by Pookie
See the thing is though, KO'ing or TKO'ing koscheck would have actually have been the much more sympathetic option, as repeated blows to the head are more detrimental to the brain than a KO is. So if he is holding back for his opponents, that means he's choosing a much more malicious route, which contradicts the stated philosophy.

Posted by KungFuMaster
Posted by Pookie
See the thing is though, KO'ing or TKO'ing koscheck would have actually have been the much more sympathetic option, as repeated blows to the head are more detrimental to the brain than a KO is. So if he is holding back for his opponents, that means he's choosing a much more malicious route, which contradicts the stated philosophy.
Of course you are going to say that if you are to challenge my perspective.
But seriously, GSP trains to win fights and not to hurt his opponents. There is such a thing called mercy. Remember Aldo vs Faber??? - The MMA world knew Aldo could have KOed or TKOed Faber. But what did he do? He did not want to embarrass the former champ and decided to settle for a unanimous decision.
You can twist the debate however you want, but I believe GSP is in it to win with as little damage to his opponents as possible.
Posted by State_Champ
Faber's leg got beaten to the point that it was a swollen purple mass... is that mercy?
Also, the Aldo/Faber fight was entertaining imo which is dissimilar to the way many MMA fans (myself included) seem to view GSP recent fights.
Posted by KungFuMaster
Posted by State_Champ
Faber's leg got beaten to the point that it was a swollen purple mass... is that mercy?
Also, the Aldo/Faber fight was entertaining imo which is dissimilar to the way many MMA fans (myself included) seem to view GSP recent fights.
If I remember correctly, in round 5, Aldo basically cruised to a decision victory while Faber courageously struggled to continue while displaying a show of heart.
When you enter a fight, you plan on doing battle and what ever it takes to win. Aldo definitely did that for the most part, but after he disabled Faber and realized Faber was done, his adrenaline dropped as there was no more perceived threats from his opponent, Faber.
Part of round 4 and all of round 5 were evident of Aldo showing mercy and respect to a great champion, Faber.
Posted by free_style_52
Well he may have gotten tired and didnt want to get caught with a big shot so he played it safe and slowed down the exchanges, pretty much what GSP does.
Posted by Pookie
Thats a mighty big assumption to be so sure of.
In my humble opinion... i think its much more likely that Aldo played it safe in the 5th for tactical reasons, than it is that he was suddenly stricken with compassion and admiration.