Posted by mkiv9secsupra
CMill....you should end this argument....I follow what youre saying perfectly. But some of these guys arent comprehending too well...From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language. Either way i see where youre coming from:
Reason(aka FACTS) - He was injured so he couldnt train properly. He got kneed in the nuts.
Excuse - He was overrated anyways. He got lucky.
Posted by zephead
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
CMill....you should end this argument....I follow what youre saying perfectly. But some of these guys arent comprehending too well...From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language. Either way i see where youre coming from:
Reason(aka FACTS) - He was injured so he couldnt train properly. He got kneed in the nuts.
Excuse - He was overrated anyways. He got lucky.
I get it, because we don't see it your way that makes us either illiterate or English isn't our first language?
You forgot an apostrophe in the word "youre". It's you're. You also forgot the apostrophe in "arent". It's aren't. The "i", is capitalized. It's I. You missed the apostrophe in "dont". It's don't. Then again in cant (can't) and in youre (again it's you're)
So, the main question is, are you dumb, or isn't English your first language? Your writing skills leave much to be desired.
Posted by zephead
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
CMill....you should end this argument....I follow what youre saying perfectly. But some of these guys arent comprehending too well...From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language. Either way i see where youre coming from:
Reason(aka FACTS) - He was injured so he couldnt train properly. He got kneed in the nuts.
Excuse - He was overrated anyways. He got lucky.
I get it, because we don't see it your way that makes us either illiterate or English isn't our first language?
You forgot an apostrophe in the word "youre". It's you're. You also forgot the apostrophe in "arent". It's aren't. The "i", is capitalized. It's I. You missed the apostrophe in "dont". It's don't. Then again in cant (can't) and in youre (again it's you're)
So, the main question is, are you dumb, or isn't English your first language? Your writing skills leave much to be desired.
Posted by cmill21
Posted by zephead
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
CMill....you should end this argument....I follow what youre saying perfectly. But some of these guys arent comprehending too well...From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language. Either way i see where youre coming from:
Reason(aka FACTS) - He was injured so he couldnt train properly. He got kneed in the nuts.
Excuse - He was overrated anyways. He got lucky.
I get it, because we don't see it your way that makes us either illiterate or English isn't our first language?
You forgot an apostrophe in the word "youre". It's you're. You also forgot the apostrophe in "arent". It's aren't. The "i", is capitalized. It's I. You missed the apostrophe in "dont". It's don't. Then again in cant (can't) and in youre (again it's you're)
So, the main question is, are you dumb, or isn't English your first language? Your writing skills leave much to be desired.
I'm sorry but as a moderater and "Community Leader" you should be more mature then this. Just MO but I don't think you of all people should be calling people dumb or illiterate.
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
Posted by zephead
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
CMill....you should end this argument....I follow what youre saying perfectly. But some of these guys arent comprehending too well...From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language. Either way i see where youre coming from:
Reason(aka FACTS) - He was injured so he couldnt train properly. He got kneed in the nuts.
Excuse - He was overrated anyways. He got lucky.
I get it, because we don't see it your way that makes us either illiterate or English isn't our first language?
You forgot an apostrophe in the word "youre". It's you're. You also forgot the apostrophe in "arent". It's aren't. The "i", is capitalized. It's I. You missed the apostrophe in "dont". It's don't. Then again in cant (can't) and in youre (again it's you're)
So, the main question is, are you dumb, or isn't English your first language? Your writing skills leave much to be desired.
well judging by your response i imagine youre either dumb or just a jackasss
Posted by tuvok500
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
Posted by zephead
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
CMill....you should end this argument....I follow what youre saying perfectly. But some of these guys arent comprehending too well...From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language. Either way i see where youre coming from:
Reason(aka FACTS) - He was injured so he couldnt train properly. He got kneed in the nuts.
Excuse - He was overrated anyways. He got lucky.
I get it, because we don't see it your way that makes us either illiterate or English isn't our first language?
You forgot an apostrophe in the word "youre". It's you're. You also forgot the apostrophe in "arent". It's aren't. The "i", is capitalized. It's I. You missed the apostrophe in "dont". It's don't. Then again in cant (can't) and in youre (again it's you're)
So, the main question is, are you dumb, or isn't English your first language? Your writing skills leave much to be desired.
well judging by your response i imagine youre either dumb or just a jackasss
poor guy, it is clear that you are the first to the left on your avatar picture.
and yes , i am french, and yes it is easier for a french to write do not, or should not because it is a direct translation from french, but of course, your are not at this level of comprehension so...![]()
Posted by zephead
Posted by cmill21
Posted by zephead
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
CMill....you should end this argument....I follow what youre saying perfectly. But some of these guys arent comprehending too well...From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language. Either way i see where youre coming from:
Reason(aka FACTS) - He was injured so he couldnt train properly. He got kneed in the nuts.
Excuse - He was overrated anyways. He got lucky.
I get it, because we don't see it your way that makes us either illiterate or English isn't our first language?
You forgot an apostrophe in the word "youre". It's you're. You also forgot the apostrophe in "arent". It's aren't. The "i", is capitalized. It's I. You missed the apostrophe in "dont". It's don't. Then again in cant (can't) and in youre (again it's you're)
So, the main question is, are you dumb, or isn't English your first language? Your writing skills leave much to be desired.
I'm sorry but as a moderater and "Community Leader" you should be more mature then this. Just MO but I don't think you of all people should be calling people dumb or illiterate.
I was trying to show him what he posted wasn't a very bright thing. Because people don't agree with your opinion, but he does, he questions our intelligence. He responds with: From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language.
That was full of quite a few errors. He misses apostrophes and commas. So what I was saying is, if he questions people about their intelligence, because they don't agree with you, but then posts something full of errors, does that make him the same?
I guess he didn't understand so decided his best course of action was to call me a jackass, that's cool. I'll look past that. In his post I can see him for what he is. Was I calling him dumb or illiterate? No. I was asking if he calls people dumb and then posts something full of errors, can he be labeled as dumb.
The one poster in this thread, tuvok500, is from Quebec, so there is a good chance that English is NOT his first language.
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
Posted by tuvok500
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
Posted by zephead
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
CMill....you should end this argument....I follow what youre saying perfectly. But some of these guys arent comprehending too well...From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language. Either way i see where youre coming from:
Reason(aka FACTS) - He was injured so he couldnt train properly. He got kneed in the nuts.
Excuse - He was overrated anyways. He got lucky.
I get it, because we don't see it your way that makes us either illiterate or English isn't our first language?
You forgot an apostrophe in the word "youre". It's you're. You also forgot the apostrophe in "arent". It's aren't. The "i", is capitalized. It's I. You missed the apostrophe in "dont". It's don't. Then again in cant (can't) and in youre (again it's you're)
So, the main question is, are you dumb, or isn't English your first language? Your writing skills leave much to be desired.
well judging by your response i imagine youre either dumb or just a jackasss
poor guy, it is clear that you are the first to the left on your avatar picture.
and yes , i am french, and yes it is easier for a french to write do not, or should not because it is a direct translation from french, but of course, your are not at this level of comprehension so...![]()
all you did was prove my point that you do not speak english as a first language....![]()
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
CMill....you should end this argument....I follow what youre saying perfectly. But some of these guys arent comprehending too well...From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language. Either way i see where youre coming from:
Reason(aka FACTS) - He was injured so he couldnt train properly. He got kneed in the nuts.
Excuse - He was overrated anyways. He got lucky.
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
Posted by zephead
Posted by cmill21
Posted by zephead
Posted by mkiv9secsupra
CMill....you should end this argument....I follow what youre saying perfectly. But some of these guys arent comprehending too well...From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language. Either way i see where youre coming from:
Reason(aka FACTS) - He was injured so he couldnt train properly. He got kneed in the nuts.
Excuse - He was overrated anyways. He got lucky.
I get it, because we don't see it your way that makes us either illiterate or English isn't our first language?
You forgot an apostrophe in the word "youre". It's you're. You also forgot the apostrophe in "arent". It's aren't. The "i", is capitalized. It's I. You missed the apostrophe in "dont". It's don't. Then again in cant (can't) and in youre (again it's you're)
So, the main question is, are you dumb, or isn't English your first language? Your writing skills leave much to be desired.
I'm sorry but as a moderater and "Community Leader" you should be more mature then this. Just MO but I don't think you of all people should be calling people dumb or illiterate.
I was trying to show him what he posted wasn't a very bright thing. Because people don't agree with your opinion, but he does, he questions our intelligence. He responds with: From the grammar i would be inclined to believe that some of these guys either dont speak english as a first langauge or are dumb because they cant even learn one language.
That was full of quite a few errors. He misses apostrophes and commas. So what I was saying is, if he questions people about their intelligence, because they don't agree with you, but then posts something full of errors, does that make him the same?
I guess he didn't understand so decided his best course of action was to call me a jackass, that's cool. I'll look past that. In his post I can see him for what he is. Was I calling him dumb or illiterate? No. I was asking if he calls people dumb and then posts something full of errors, can he be labeled as dumb.
The one poster in this thread, tuvok500, is from Quebec, so there is a good chance that English is NOT his first language.
who questioned someones intelligence? clearly it was not me. it is obvious he does not speak english as a first language. in no way do i think he is dumb. he's the one speaking/writing in two langauges. i sure as hell cant.
Wow you should really question your maturity if youre so peaved about me not using punctuation that you have to point it out to make yourslef look better.
Posted by tuvok500
...and yes , i am french, and yes it is easier for a french to write do not, or should not because it is a direct translation from french, but of course, your are not at this level of comprehension so...![]()
to you Rush.
Posted by TNunley
Posted by tuvok500
...and yes , i am french, and yes it is easier for a french to write do not, or should not because it is a direct translation from french, but of course, your are not at this level of comprehension so...![]()
Not that I've really contributed anything to this conversation, and not that it makes any difference... I just thought I'd put in my two cents like I do so often.
Anyway, so I had this Psychology professor that required writing reports based upon articles he would find. To him using contractions (e.g. don't, won't, it's, etc.) was laziness and showed grammatical inferiority. He would take off points for saying "don't" instead of "do not" and so on. So just thought I would mention that according to a University professor that teaches at a school accredited by an accrediting body (AACSB) that only accredits (yeah I realize how many times I used the damn word) the top 25% of all business schools (Including Harvard, Yale, etc.)... The way you type/speak is more grammatically correct than to use contractions.
Soto you Rush.
Posted by tuvok500
Posted by TNunley
Posted by tuvok500
...and yes , i am french, and yes it is easier for a french to write do not, or should not because it is a direct translation from french, but of course, your are not at this level of comprehension so...![]()
Not that I've really contributed anything to this conversation, and not that it makes any difference... I just thought I'd put in my two cents like I do so often.
Anyway, so I had this Psychology professor that required writing reports based upon articles he would find. To him using contractions (e.g. don't, won't, it's, etc.) was laziness and showed grammatical inferiority. He would take off points for saying "don't" instead of "do not" and so on. So just thought I would mention that according to a University professor that teaches at a school accredited by an accrediting body (AACSB) that only accredits (yeah I realize how many times I used the damn word) the top 25% of all business schools (Including Harvard, Yale, etc.)... The way you type/speak is more grammatically correct than to use contractions.
Soto you Rush.
LOL !! man
i am very happy to read your post !!
so, i will not try to improuve my writting to help some peoples here to better understand what i say. cool !!
by the way, all my english come from star trek, and specially data !! LOL![]()
Posted by nubby
Posted by tuvok500
Posted by TNunley
Posted by tuvok500
...and yes , i am french, and yes it is easier for a french to write do not, or should not because it is a direct translation from french, but of course, your are not at this level of comprehension so...![]()
Not that I've really contributed anything to this conversation, and not that it makes any difference... I just thought I'd put in my two cents like I do so often.
Anyway, so I had this Psychology professor that required writing reports based upon articles he would find. To him using contractions (e.g. don't, won't, it's, etc.) was laziness and showed grammatical inferiority. He would take off points for saying "don't" instead of "do not" and so on. So just thought I would mention that according to a University professor that teaches at a school accredited by an accrediting body (AACSB) that only accredits (yeah I realize how many times I used the damn word) the top 25% of all business schools (Including Harvard, Yale, etc.)... The way you type/speak is more grammatically correct than to use contractions.
Soto you Rush.
LOL !! man
i am very happy to read your post !!
so, i will not try to improuve my writting to help some peoples here to better understand what i say. cool !!
by the way, all my english come from star trek, and specially data !! LOL![]()
Data is the shit!