This discussion should be wrapped up, I really don't think my post warranted these long responses but here we go.
Posted by Bubbles
I'm not defending Chael at all for getting a LHW title shot, you are sadly mistaken. I'm pointing out the fallacy in being content with Belfort getting 2 title shots while shitting on Chael for being awarded his LHW title shot.
Actually that is what your doing. I didn't bring Vitor up you did, and you did it to defend Chael lol the irony of your post. And I never said I was okay with Vitor getting title shots just playing devil's advocate. But the way the situations worked out, Vitor was the only guy on short notice for Jones and he was a former LHW champ so it didn't sound that strange of a replacement, certainly a more competant and reasonable replacement than Chael I cant win a belt or stop a triangle Sonnen. Vitor was a credible threat to Anderson and beat the former champ of the division to get that fight and lots of people wanted to see Anderson vs strikers for the past few years. We could continue to split hairs but that's the situation, you don't have to like it, just like how I hated Brock Lesnar when they gave him a title shot at 2-1 but I dealt with it.
Posted by Bubbles
Franklin was not relevant at MW at the time. He fought Wanderlei at catchweight just before, and prior to that his last 2 fights were at LHW. Again zero relevance to MW title inplications. Was being Hamill and losing to Hendo worth a top 10 spot at LHW??? Vitor could have fought anyone else in the division, he chose not to. Or he could have actually fought a MW after the Franklin fight
He was relevant to the division just not to Anderson, there's a big difference. And I already said that 195 is barely different than 185, I already said that Franklin had his 10lb advantage over Vitor and still got ktfo, yet you still bring that up.
Posted by Bubbles
Couture kicked his ass the next fight, all but proving that cut loss was bullshit and a technicality on both records. Sure the title changed hands, but Vitor in no way shape or form "beat" Couture by stoppage or decision. By this logic Hamill beat Jones and therefore should be in the title talks for doing so after his recent win.
Couture should get his title back from doctor stoppage but Vitor shouldn't....Speaking of logical fallacies....
Posted by Bubbles
What non champion has "great wins" rather than only good ones? Sonnen arguably has better "good wins" than Belfort. What "great" wins does Belfort have? You just said that Couture and Wanderlei were good and those are probably his best wins. He may not have the best record but the UFC did employ a champion who's record was 4-1. By your definition, anyone who isn't a champion, or was one, is overrated. I didn't know being #2 in your division is overrated...so what does that say about the MW division and Anderson's legacy??
Another logical fallacy, this time it's an equivocation fallacy, I called Chael overrated for specific reasons not because I think anyone who isn't a champ or was one is overrated, that doesn't even make sense to anything I said, maybe you should stop smoking so much weed. Bottom line is Randy and Wandy are better to have on your resume than Marquardt and Bisping that's for sure.
Posted by Bubbles
Chael's pillow fists dropped Anderson a few times, his shitty jitz defense actually stopped all of Silva's attempts prior to that hail mary, as well as Dan Millers and Nate Marquardts attempts. Finishing skills or not, a win is a win. A flash KO means less than dominating your opponent and making him feel weak and useless for the entirety of the fight.
The fact that you call it a hail mary makes me want to puke all over my screen.
And cmon, I enjoy fights not Lay and Pray circle jerking with no passing guard or attempting to go for significant strikes or subs, most of the time Chael just sits in guard and pitter patters enough to not get stood up, I wish Fernando Yamasaki would ref a Chael Sonnen fight we would actually see an exciting Chael fight for once.
Posted by Bubbles
Again Belfort's championship was on a technicality, not by actually winning the fight by conventional means. Ben Askren has more merit of getting a WW title shot than Belfort did as his championship was earned , not awarded. There are only a select few "credible threats" to each champion. The only argument here is whether or not Chael earned it. The only answer is no and anyone who disagrees is an idiot. But if you have followed the UFC at all in the last few years, a good chunk of title shots haven't been earned but awarded. This is nothing new except to bring better ratings to a stale reality show and bring in huge PPV #s.
I wouldn't care of Ben Askren gave GSP a taste of his own LnP medicine.
Posted by Bubbles
I'm not here to discredit Belfort as my sole purpose, but to point out the holes in your stance. You try to say Belfort earned his shots by non conventional means but slam Sonnen for basically the same thing. You hate Sonnen so much you can't give him any credit. I hate Anderson more than the next guy, but I can still respect what he has done even though I could try to discredit almost every win on his UFC record
You that high? I don't have a stance on Belfort I was playing devil's advocate (if you even know what that means) YOU'RE the one in thread who brought up Vitor at all and it was solely to discredit him and tell us how much you think he didn't deserve anything, I was talking about Chael and you switched scopes. Thanks but try being honest next time, k, bye I gotta do errands....