| 16+ | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15% | (7) |
| 11-15 | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
26% | (12) |
| 6-10 | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33% | (15) |
| 2-5 | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22% | (10) |
| 1 | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4% | (2) |

Posted by Copenhagen
Cant and RNC, you both have Silva as #1 P4P on your playground list, yet ya'll don't say he is ranked #1 in the LHW. If you think Silva is #1 P4P, and he is able to make 205 (which he is) why wouldn't you vote for him #1 LHW? I'm just curious. (I know many people have different opinions on what P4P means.)
Posted by juanez13
Posted by Copenhagen
Cant and RNC, you both have Silva as #1 P4P on your playground list, yet ya'll don't say he is ranked #1 in the LHW. If you think Silva is #1 P4P, and he is able to make 205 (which he is) why wouldn't you vote for him #1 LHW? I'm just curious. (I know many people have different opinions on what P4P means.)
P4P doesnt have anything to do with them fighting at different weight classes IMO, because BJ penn is considered the best P4P doesnt mean he can beat every other guy in the other weight classes.
P4P is taking a fighters skills and matching them against the other top fighters. Like in terms of skill how does he match up against fedor for example? does he have better wrestling, BJJ, strikingg, etc......to think that being P4P best means being able to beat other champs at higher weight classes IMO is ridiculous, of course it can be done, but that has nothing to do with being P4P best
Posted by juanez13
Posted by Copenhagen
Cant and RNC, you both have Silva as #1 P4P on your playground list, yet ya'll don't say he is ranked #1 in the LHW. If you think Silva is #1 P4P, and he is able to make 205 (which he is) why wouldn't you vote for him #1 LHW? I'm just curious. (I know many people have different opinions on what P4P means.)
P4P doesnt have anything to do with them fighting at different weight classes IMO, because BJ penn is considered the best P4P doesnt mean he can beat every other guy in the other weight classes.
P4P is taking a fighters skills and matching them against the other top fighters. Like in terms of skill how does he match up against fedor for example? does he have better wrestling, BJJ, strikingg, etc......to think that being P4P best means being able to beat other champs at higher weight classes IMO is ridiculous, of course it can be done, but that has nothing to do with being P4P best
Posted by Copenhagen
Posted by juanez13
Posted by Copenhagen
Cant and RNC, you both have Silva as #1 P4P on your playground list, yet ya'll don't say he is ranked #1 in the LHW. If you think Silva is #1 P4P, and he is able to make 205 (which he is) why wouldn't you vote for him #1 LHW? I'm just curious. (I know many people have different opinions on what P4P means.)
P4P doesnt have anything to do with them fighting at different weight classes IMO, because BJ penn is considered the best P4P doesnt mean he can beat every other guy in the other weight classes.
P4P is taking a fighters skills and matching them against the other top fighters. Like in terms of skill how does he match up against fedor for example? does he have better wrestling, BJJ, strikingg, etc......to think that being P4P best means being able to beat other champs at higher weight classes IMO is ridiculous, of course it can be done, but that has nothing to do with being P4P best
Figured it was the case of different definitions of P4P. For me P4P means if everyone weighed the same weight, who would be the best. Everyone has their own definition.

.
Posted by king_katool
rankings can be confusing sometimes becasue if yu were to ask me to rank guys based on skill it would be COMPLETELY different as to if i ranked the through achievements, so for sake of arguement SKILL wise i say anderson is EASILY top5, but i wouldnt rank him top 10 yet if he KOs a top 10 like he did james he'll jump right in my rankings but not yet
Posted by MFOTHER
Posted by king_katool
rankings can be confusing sometimes becasue if yu were to ask me to rank guys based on skill it would be COMPLETELY different as to if i ranked the through achievements, so for sake of arguement SKILL wise i say anderson is EASILY top5, but i wouldnt rank him top 10 yet if he KOs a top 10 like he did james he'll jump right in my rankings but not yet
perfect.![]()
Posted by soundboy1
I would put him at number two. If you watch all his UFC fights he has been so thoroughly dominant, I don't see how you can rank him any lower. Forrest holds the belt so he gets number 1. I do think Anderson Will destroy the lhw class though..
Posted by jkdskinhead
Posted by soundboy1
I would put him at number two. If you watch all his UFC fights he has been so thoroughly dominant, I don't see how you can rank him any lower. Forrest holds the belt so he gets number 1. I do think Anderson Will destroy the lhw class though..
Defeating a B fighter, and being dominat in a lower weight class doesnt prove anything to me. The LHW division is stacked, and he'll have to prove himself against an army of bigger, stronger, and more talented men then he was fighting before. I dont think those wild shots are gonna land on Forrest or Machida.. I dont think his chin will handle Jackson or Liddel.
Posted by king_katool
Posted by jkdskinhead
Posted by soundboy1
I would put him at number two. If you watch all his UFC fights he has been so thoroughly dominant, I don't see how you can rank him any lower. Forrest holds the belt so he gets number 1. I do think Anderson Will destroy the lhw class though..
Defeating a B fighter, and being dominat in a lower weight class doesnt prove anything to me. The LHW division is stacked, and he'll have to prove himself against an army of bigger, stronger, and more talented men then he was fighting before. I dont think those wild shots are gonna land on Forrest or Machida.. I dont think his chin will handle Jackson or Liddel.
When did anderson start throwing wild shots? its common knowledge he is the most accurate strike in MMA, and just because the statement bugs me anderson would KO chuck sooooo bad, chuck is losing his power age is catching him he would not be able to hit anderson never mind KO him
Posted by jkdskinhead
If he wants to get in a crazy exchange with chuck, let him, theres a good chance he'll get caught
Posted by mrsmiley
Anderson is one of the best fighters in the world right now,but honestly,I consider MW to be a weaker division.Not a bad division,just in comparison to LHW,MW doesn't seemed as stacked.
However,that in no way shape or form belittle's Anderson's skill as a mixed martial artist.I think Anderson could easily sucseed at any weight class he wanted.
However,I have to put him at the bottom of the LHW top 10.Not because I believe his skills are inferior to the other 205 fighters,but that division is so stacked,to put him in the top 3 or 5 seems to be a huge disservice to all the fighters at the top of the LHW food chain.